Mark Fasheh
2015-Apr-16 21:15 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2_iop_set/get_acl() are also called from the VFS so we must take inode lock
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:51:41AM -0700, Tariq Saeed wrote:> I have no objection to applying your suggestions and re-submitting the > patch. Mark, what is the protocol for that. Do I need to mention > that this is a re-sumit?If you're re-submitting something that hasn't gone upstream yet it's sufficient to add a 'V2' (or whatever you like) to the subject line. Also, a change log in those cases is nice. Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh
Tariq Saeed
2015-Apr-16 21:23 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2_iop_set/get_acl() are also called from the VFS so we must take inode lock
On 04/16/2015 02:15 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:> change log in those cases is nice.Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by 'change log'. I have not seen any message about this patch's -v1 into being queued for main stream (unless the message is in transit -- very unlikely!). So, basically, how do I request to discard the first version ... or is that request implicit in submitting -v2? Thanks -Tariq