Arjen de Korte
2010-Dec-12 13:23 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2731 - in trunk/docs: . man website website/scripts
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>:> Author: aquette > Date: Sat Dec 11 12:31:21 2010 > New Revision: 2731 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731 > > Log: > Complete the list of Subversion ignored files, with AsciiDoc > generated contents (no functional changes)Is there a particular reason for having both the man/ and docs/man/ pages in the trunk? As far as I can see, the first has been replaced by the second. Best regards, Arjen -- Please keep list traffic on the list (off-list replies will be rejected)
Arnaud Quette
2010-Dec-12 15:09 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2731 - in trunk/docs: . man website website/scripts
2010/12/12 Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org <nut%2Bdevel at de-korte.org>>> Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org>: > > > Author: aquette >> Date: Sat Dec 11 12:31:21 2010 >> New Revision: 2731 >> URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731 >> >> Log: >> Complete the list of Subversion ignored files, with AsciiDoc generated >> contents (no functional changes) >> > > Is there a particular reason for having both the man/ and docs/man/ pages > in the trunk? As far as I can see, the first has been replaced by the > second. >right, and I'm currently working on that. cheers, Arnaud -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20101212/9b57626d/attachment.htm>
Charles Lepple
2010-Dec-12 15:31 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2731 - in trunk/docs: . man website website/scripts
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote:> Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org>: > >> Author: aquette >> Date: Sat Dec 11 12:31:21 2010 >> New Revision: 2731 >> URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731 >> >> Log: >> Complete the list of Subversion ignored files, with AsciiDoc generated >> contents (no functional changes) > > Is there a particular reason for having both the man/ and docs/man/ pages in > the trunk? As far as I can see, the first has been replaced by the second.Sorry about that - during the conversion to AsciiDoc, I didn't remove each man page as it was converted. I missed that during the merge, too. -- - Charles Lepple
Reasonably Related Threads
- [nut-commits] svn commit r2610 - branches/silent_build
- [nut-commits] svn commit r2748 - trunk
- [nut-commits] svn commit r1846 - in trunk: . clients common drivers include man server
- [nut-commits] svn commit r1800 - in trunk: . data drivers
- [nut-commits] svn commit r2036 - trunk/man