nsd users - Apr 2016 - DNSSEC question

Sometimes when a owner has multiple A (or AAAA) records, recursive 
resolvers change the order in which a client receives them.

Does DNSSEC force them to be in the same order or is the order still 
subject to change and the whim of a recursive server?

What I am trying to do is set up fall-back IP addresses in case a 
particular IP address is offline, and trying to find work-around for a 
lack of order preference (like MX records have) in A/AAAA records.

I use DNSSEC anyway and am *hoping* that means DNSSEC enforcing 
resolvers will preserve the order the records have coming from the 
authoritative server.

Thanks for suggestions.

No.  DNS does not have "an order".


On 2016 Apr 04 (Mon) at 13:29:15 -0700 (-0700), Michael A. Peters wrote:
:Sometimes when a owner has multiple A (or AAAA) records, recursive resolvers
:change the order in which a client receives them.
:
:Does DNSSEC force them to be in the same order or is the order still subject
:to change and the whim of a recursive server?
:
:What I am trying to do is set up fall-back IP addresses in case a particular
:IP address is offline, and trying to find work-around for a lack of order
:preference (like MX records have) in A/AAAA records.
:
:I use DNSSEC anyway and am *hoping* that means DNSSEC enforcing resolvers
:will preserve the order the records have coming from the authoritative
:server.
:
:Thanks for suggestions.

-- 
Cable is not a luxury, since many areas have poor TV reception.
		-- The mayor of Tucson, Arizona, 1989