Brett Carr writes: > > I would echo Anands endorsement of the nodb mode we use this for all of > our TLD secondaries and have found it very efficient and stable. This discussion raises the question whether we should make this the default and havng the database optional (for backward compatibilaty). jaap
On 16/03/16 11:13, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:> > I would echo Anands endorsement of the nodb mode we use this for all of > > our TLD secondaries and have found it very efficient and stable. > > This discussion raises the question whether we should make this the > default and havng the database optional (for backward compatibilaty).Yes, I would like this very much! Many +1's for this change. Anand
On 2016 Mar 16 (Wed) at 11:13:14 +0100 (+0100), Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: : Brett Carr writes: : : > : > I would echo Anands endorsement of the nodb mode we use this for all of : > our TLD secondaries and have found it very efficient and stable. : :This discussion raises the question whether we should make this the :default and havng the database optional (for backward compatibilaty). : : jaap Additionally, what is the benefit of the database? If this is being disabled at both the largest sites, and being disabled in standard distributions, and is somewhat.....fragile, why continue shipping it? -- Mosher's Law of Software Engineering: Don't worry if it doesn't work right. If everything did, you'd be out of a job.
> On 16 Mar 2016, at 10:13, Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap at nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > Brett Carr writes: > >> >> I would echo Anands endorsement of the nodb mode we use this for all of >> our TLD secondaries and have found it very efficient and stable. > > This discussion raises the question whether we should make this the > default and havng the database optional (for backward compatibilaty). > > jaapGenerally I would say yes this would be a good call however I am always cautious about changing the defaults in software that is important and that people rely on. Not everybody reads mailing lists or software release notes before upgrading, I?d like to think that everybody tests all software before it is changed (we certainly do) however I have worked places where this definitely does not happen. If the default changes then it needs to do this in a seamless manner and it needs to be very clear in the release notes and documentation. Brett -- Brett Carr Senior DNS Engineer Nominet UK