Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-Apr-29 15:30 UTC
nouveau: r535.c:1266:3: error: label at end of compound statement default: with gcc-8
On 29.04.24 17:06, Naresh Kamboju wrote:> Following build warnings / errors noticed on Linux next-20240429 tag on the > arm64, arm and riscv with gcc-8 and gcc-13 builds pass. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft at linaro.org> > > Commit id: > b58a0bc904ff nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support > > Buids: > -- > gcc-8-arm64-defconfig - Fail > gcc-8-arm-defconfig - Fail > gcc-8-riscv-defconfig - Fail > > Build log: > ---- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c: In function 'build_registry': > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1266:3: error: label at > end of compound statement > default: > ^~~~~~~ > make[7]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.o] Error 1TWIMC, there is another report about this in this thread (sadly some of its post did not make it to lore): https://lore.kernel.org/all/162ef3c0-1d7b-4220-a21f-b0008657f8a5 at redhat.com/ Ciao, Thorsten> metadata: > git_describe: next-20240429 > git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next > git_short_log: b0a2c79c6f35 ("Add linux-next specific files for 20240429") > arch: arm64, arm, riscv > toolchain: gcc-8 > > Steps to reproduce: > ---- > # tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-8 > --kconfig defconfig > > Links: > - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2flcoOuqVJfhTvX4AOYsWMd5hqe/ > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240429/testrun/23704376/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/history/ > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240429/testrun/23705756/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/details/ > > > -- > Linaro LKFT > https://lkft.linaro.org > >
Timur Tabi
2024-Apr-29 17:08 UTC
nouveau: r535.c:1266:3: error: label at end of compound statement default: with gcc-8
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 17:30 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:> TWIMC, there is another report about this in this thread (sadly some of > its post did not make it to lore): > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/162ef3c0-1d7b-4220-a21f-b0008657f8a5 at redhat.com/ > > Ciao, ThorstenThis doesn't fail on x86-64 when I build it. I also did a cross-compile to arm64 with the arm64 defconfig, and it doesn't fail there either. I'm guessing this is a compiler version thing. I'm using gcc 11.4. Is that just too old?