Logcheck devel - Nov 2008 - Bug#506333: logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.

Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.54
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

the placeholder for the process name (scponly) is missing and
/usr/lib/sftp-server is not considered as valid.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages logcheck-database depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]        1.5.11etch2 Debian configuration management sy

logcheck-database recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  logcheck-database/conffile-cleanup: false

tag 506333 - patch
thanks

* Robert Ewald <r3wald at gmail.com> [2008-11-20 18:19:04
CET]:
> Package: logcheck-database
> Version: 1.2.54
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
> 
> the placeholder for the process name (scponly) is missing and
> /usr/lib/sftp-server is not considered as valid.
 Do you have a sample line, or ... actually a patch when you tag the bug
with patch? I don't see neither, so I'm removing the patch tag.

 Thanks,
Rhonda

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Robert Ewald
wrote:
> the placeholder for the process name (scponly) is missing and
> /usr/lib/sftp-server is not considered as valid.
There were actually a couple more commands missing, so I just scanned
through the scponly source code and added the whole list.

(Next time, you might want to provide a little bit more details; this
was somewhat cryptic to us people not familiar with scponly.)


-- 
Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer.
		-- JHM on #Debian

Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:19:22 +0000
with message-id <E1NIoXq-0000MJ-N6 at ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#506333: fixed in logcheck 1.3.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #506333,
regarding logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
506333: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506333
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Robert Ewald <r3wald at gmail.com>
Subject: logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:19:04 +0100
Size: 2524
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20091210/cffe00e1/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda at debian.at>
Subject: Bug#506333: fixed in logcheck 1.3.4
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:19:22 +0000
Size: 8647
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20091210/cffe00e1/attachment-0001.eml>