Robert Ewald
2008-Nov-20 17:19 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#506333: logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.54 Severity: minor Tags: patch the placeholder for the process name (scponly) is missing and /usr/lib/sftp-server is not considered as valid. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages logcheck-database depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11etch2 Debian configuration management sy logcheck-database recommends no packages. -- debconf information: logcheck-database/conffile-cleanup: false
Gerfried Fuchs
2008-Nov-24 09:05 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#506333: logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.
tag 506333 - patch thanks * Robert Ewald <r3wald at gmail.com> [2008-11-20 18:19:04 CET]:> Package: logcheck-database > Version: 1.2.54 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > the placeholder for the process name (scponly) is missing and > /usr/lib/sftp-server is not considered as valid.Do you have a sample line, or ... actually a patch when you tag the bug with patch? I don't see neither, so I'm removing the patch tag. Thanks, Rhonda
Frédéric Brière
2009-Aug-18 22:10 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#506333: logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Robert Ewald wrote:> the placeholder for the process name (scponly) is missing and > /usr/lib/sftp-server is not considered as valid.There were actually a couple more commands missing, so I just scanned through the scponly source code and added the whole list. (Next time, you might want to provide a little bit more details; this was somewhat cryptic to us people not familiar with scponly.) -- Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer. -- JHM on #Debian
Debian Bug Tracking System
2009-Dec-10 19:21 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#506333: marked as done (logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match.)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:19:22 +0000 with message-id <E1NIoXq-0000MJ-N6 at ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#506333: fixed in logcheck 1.3.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #506333, regarding logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 506333: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506333 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Robert Ewald <r3wald at gmail.com> Subject: logcheck-database: scponly rule doesn't match. Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:19:04 +0100 Size: 2524 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20091210/cffe00e1/attachment.eml> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda at debian.at> Subject: Bug#506333: fixed in logcheck 1.3.4 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:19:22 +0000 Size: 8647 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20091210/cffe00e1/attachment-0001.eml>