Logcheck devel - Nov 2007 - Bug#453519: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by amavisd-new

Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.63
Severity: minor

The content of the file
/etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-amavisd-new is contained
already in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/amavisd-new (this one
shipped with amavisd-new).

Regards

marc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- debconf information:
* logcheck-database/rules-directories-note:
  logcheck-database/standard-rename-note:
  logcheck-database/conffile-cleanup: false

tags 453519 moreinfo
thanks

In article <20071130003240.GA32509 at ortie> you
wrote:
> Version: 1.2.63
>
> The content of the file
> /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-amavisd-new is contained
> already in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/amavisd-new (this one
> shipped with amavisd-new).
Both amavisd-new rules files were removed in 1.2.63 for that exact
reason.  Are you saying that they are still present on your machine?


-- 
<sangr> home is where the highest bandwidth is

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> tags 453519 moreinfo
Bug#453519: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by
amavisd-new
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

* Fr?d?ric Bri?re [2008-03-16 02:25:50 -0400]:
> tags 453519 moreinfo
> In article <20071130003240.GA32509 at ortie> you wrote:
> > Version: 1.2.63
> >
> > The content of the file
> > /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-amavisd-new is contained
> > already in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/amavisd-new (this one
> > shipped with amavisd-new).
> 
> Both amavisd-new rules files were removed in 1.2.63 for that exact
> reason.  Are you saying that they are still present on your machine?
Yes, with logcheck and logcheck-database 1.2.63:

$ dpkg -S /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-amavisd-new
logcheck-database: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-amavisd
-new

$ dpkg -S /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/amavisd-new
amavisd-new: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/amavisd-new

-- 
marc

Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:19:22 +0000
with message-id <E1NIoXq-0000M8-L3 at ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#453519: fixed in logcheck 1.3.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #453519,
regarding logcheck-database: conffiles long removed from package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
453519: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Marc Bobillier <marc at umbersun.net>
Subject: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by
	amavisd-new
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:32:51 +0100
Size: 2347
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20091210/e59a05c6/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda at debian.at>
Subject: Bug#453519: fixed in logcheck 1.3.4
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:19:22 +0000
Size: 8647
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20091210/e59a05c6/attachment-0001.eml>