arno renevier
2007-Nov-08 21:11 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#450660: logcheck: acpid rules do not filter enough
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.63 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, There was recently a modification to filter acpid stuffs. But there are still things not filtered by logcheck. When I unplugg, then plug back my battery, I get following notifications: System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: received event "ac_adapter AC0 00000080 00000000" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: completed event "ac_adapter AC0 00000080 00000000" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: received event "processor CPU1 00000080 00000004" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: completed event "processor CPU1 00000080 00000004" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: received event "processor CPU1 00000081 00000000" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: completed event "processor CPU1 00000081 00000000" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: received event "battery BAT0 00000080 00000001" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork acpid: completed event "battery BAT0 00000080 00000001" Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork powersave-asus_hotkey_handler[15669]: readonly EV_ID modified. Multiple invocation of helper_functions? Nov 8 21:41:31 morpork [asus_hotkey_handler][15669]: commandline arguments: 'hotkey' 'ATKD' '00000057' '0000000c' Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: received event "ac_adapter AC0 00000080 00000001" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: completed event "ac_adapter AC0 00000080 00000001" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: received event "processor CPU1 00000080 00000004" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: completed event "processor CPU1 00000080 00000004" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: received event "processor CPU1 00000081 00000000" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: completed event "processor CPU1 00000081 00000000" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: received event "battery BAT0 00000080 00000001" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork acpid: completed event "battery BAT0 00000080 00000001" Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork powersave-asus_hotkey_handler[15687]: readonly EV_ID modified. Multiple invocation of helper_functions? Nov 8 21:41:35 morpork [asus_hotkey_handler][15687]: commandline arguments: 'hotkey' 'ATKD' '00000058' '0000000e' I attach a patch that removes most of those stuffs. After applying the patch, I get the following notifications: System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-Nov 8 21:55:35 morpork powersave-asus_hotkey_handler[18782]: readonly EV_ID modified. Multiple invocation of helper_functions? Nov 8 21:55:35 morpork [asus_hotkey_handler][18782]: commandline arguments: 'hotkey' 'ATKD' '00000057' '0000000d' Nov 8 21:55:37 morpork powersave-asus_hotkey_handler[18810]: readonly EV_ID modified. Multiple invocation of helper_functions? Nov 8 21:55:37 morpork [asus_hotkey_handler][18810]: commandline arguments: 'hotkey' 'ATKD' '00000058' '0000000f' Hope that helps arno -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22custom Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser 3.105 add and remove users and groups ii cron 3.0pl1-100 management of regular background p ii lockfile-progs 0.1.11 Programs for locking and unlocking ii logtail 1.2.63 Print log file lines that have not ii mailx 1:8.1.2-0.20071017cvs-2 A simple mail user agent ii postfix [mail-tr 2.4.6-1 High-performance mail transport ag ii sysklogd [system 1.5-1 System Logging Daemon Versions of packages logcheck recommends: ii logcheck-database 1.2.63 database of system log rules for t -- no debconf information -------------- next part -------------- diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/acpid b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/acpid index faebe1e..15ee6f3 100644 --- a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/acpid +++ b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/acpid @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: action exited with status 0$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: [[:digit:]]+ client rule[s]{0,1} loaded$ -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: received event "[[:lower:]/]+ [[:upper:]]+ [[:xdigit:]]{8} [[:xdigit:]]{8}"$ -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: completed event "[[:lower:]/]+ [[:upper:]]+ [[:xdigit:]]{8} [[:xdigit:]]{8}"$ +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: received event "[[:lower:]_/]+ [[:upper:][:digit:]]+ [[:xdigit:]]{8} [[:xdigit:]]{8}"$ +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: completed event "[[:lower:]_/]+ [[:upper:][:digit:]]+ [[:xdigit:]]{8} [[:xdigit:]]{8}"$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: client connected from [[:digit:]]+\[[[:digit:]]+:[[:digit:]]+\]$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: notifying client [[:digit:]]+\[[[:digit:]]+:[[:digit:]]+\]$ -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: executing action "/etc/acpi/(actions/){0,1}[[:alnum:]_]+\.sh( [[:lower:]/]+( [[:upper:]]+ [[:xdigit:]]{8} [[:xdigit:]]{8}){0,1}){0,1}"$ +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: executing action "/etc/acpi/(actions/){0,1}[[:alnum:]_]+\.sh( [[:lower:]_/]+( [[:upper:][:digit:]]+ [[:xdigit:]]{8} [[:xdigit:]]{8}){0,1}){0,1}"$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ acpid: client has disconnected$
Debian Bug Tracking System
2008-Jun-25 13:21 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#450660: marked as done (logcheck: acpid rules do not filter enough)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:02:06 +0000 with message-id <E1KBUdS-0003of-UM at ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#450660: fixed in logcheck 1.2.65 has caused the Debian Bug report #450660, regarding logcheck: acpid rules do not filter enough to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 450660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450660 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: arno renevier <arenevier at fdn.fr> Subject: logcheck: acpid rules do not filter enough Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:11:06 +0100 Size: 7043 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20080625/eabd8f0e/attachment.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: madduck at debian.org (martin f. krafft) Subject: Bug#450660: fixed in logcheck 1.2.65 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:02:06 +0000 Size: 7009 Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20080625/eabd8f0e/attachment-0001.eml
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Bizarre multi-homed name resolution with nmbd?
- [RFC PATCH v7 52/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU
- [RFC PATCH v6 16/92] kvm: introspection: handle events and event replies
- Bug#446310: setting package to logcheck-database logtail logcheck, tagging 452879, tagging 450660, tagging 450697 ...
- XenClient:How to install VM