maximilian attems
2006-Jan-03 01:18 UTC
Bug#344832: (fwd) Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header
----- Forwarded message from General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> ----- X-Original-To: maks at sternwelten.at Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:59:03 +0100 From: General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> To: maximilian attems <maks at sternwelten.at> Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:09:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:> please provide the noncorrect subject line and what is your wish? > > reading the switches it seems pretty clear that the highest alerts wins > as expeceted.If I became an email with the content: -------------------------------------- Security Events for su =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- . . . System Events =-=-=-=-=-=-. . . The subject line is: -------------------- "Subject: [logcheck] t-39-6-gs 02-01-2006 14:30 Security Events" And I wish to change it to: --------------------------- "Subject: [logcheck] t-39-6-gs 02-01-2006 14:30 Security Events, System Events" So that anybody can filter and split the mail like priority.> > +# Modified by Markus Nass <generalstone at gmx.net> > > + > > # This file is part of Logcheck > > a bit bold for a 4 line patch.I include this line automaticly, because I can see that this is not the original from the packet but important for me not to override at an update. -Markus Nass -- Key fingerprint = DC3C 257C 2B71 8FA4 F609 F7F7 7C14 F806 5665 77FD ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Was nicht fliegen kann, kann auch nicht abst?rzen. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- maks
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
2006-Feb-12 04:09 UTC
Bug#344832: (fwd) Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header
On 3 Jan 2006, at 01:18, maximilian attems wrote:> ----- Forwarded message from General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> > ----- > From: General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> > To: maximilian attems <maks at sternwelten.at> > Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:09:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: >> please provide the noncorrect subject line and what is your wish? >> >> reading the switches it seems pretty clear that the highest alerts >> wins >> as expeceted.<snip>> The subject line is: > -------------------- > "Subject: [logcheck] t-39-6-gs 02-01-2006 14:30 Security Events" > > And I wish to change it to: > --------------------------- > "Subject: [logcheck] t-39-6-gs 02-01-2006 14:30 Security Events, > System Events" > > So that anybody can filter and split the mail like priority.If there are Security Events and System Events then the subject will include Security Events, if there are only System Events, the subject will be System Events. I don't see how making the subject more complicated will enhance filtering - users can already filter on Security Events. -- -Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org> t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795 PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8 never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060212/7fbc405a/attachment.pgp