maks attems
2004-Aug-12 13:12 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote:> Update of /cvsroot/logcheck/logcheck/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server > In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv5535/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server > > Modified Files: > proftpd > Added Files: > qmail > Log Message: > add qmail, proftpd rulesqmail is nonfree, changelog already features a removal of old qmail rules, i'm against shipping 1.2.25 with those. a++ maks -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20040812/d7d1a9e8/attachment.pgp
Todd Troxell
2004-Aug-12 18:54 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:12:32PM +0200, maks attems wrote:> On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > > > Update of /cvsroot/logcheck/logcheck/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server > > In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv5535/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server > > > > Modified Files: > > proftpd > > Added Files: > > qmail > > Log Message: > > add qmail, proftpd rules > > qmail is nonfree, changelog already features a removal of old qmail rules, > i'm against shipping 1.2.25 with those.Could you explain your reasoning for this? I don't see how it hurts logcheck to have a few extra rules included. It is sad that qmail is non-free, but it is a widely used MTA. -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `' `- ]