Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2021-Oct-07 15:42 UTC
[llvm-dev] Proposal: introduce dependency on abseil when building benchmarks
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 16:07, Mircea Trofin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Gentle reminder - I'd plan on moving forward with the abseil dependency by > the EOW, unless there's pushback. >Also, please, never assume consensus if no one replies. Lack of push back isn't the same as agreement. You proposed a breaking change, gave 7 days for everyone to find this email, and assumed EOW would be fair game if no one replied. This is really not good enough. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211007/8f1a0978/attachment.html>
Mircea Trofin via llvm-dev
2021-Oct-07 15:45 UTC
[llvm-dev] Proposal: introduce dependency on abseil when building benchmarks
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:42 AM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote:> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 16:07, Mircea Trofin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Gentle reminder - I'd plan on moving forward with the abseil dependency >> by the EOW, unless there's pushback. >> > > Also, please, never assume consensus if no one replies. Lack of push back > isn't the same as agreement. > > You proposed a breaking change, gave 7 days for everyone to find this > email, and assumed EOW would be fair game if no one replied. >> This is really not good enough. >What would be the preferred duration? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211007/bbc76bdf/attachment-0001.html>