llvm dev - Oct 2020 - [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated
commands:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for
now.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
wrote:
> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be
> a functional equivalent of the old one.
> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot.
>
> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand
> directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>
> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> They are online now -
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>
>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
will
>>> need more love and care.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>
>>
>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier.
I and
>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to
use
>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
test
>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
buildbot
>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you
can
>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of
the
>> script.
>>
>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
some
>> help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201013/fe9db856/attachment.html>

They do on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc

Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.



On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
annotated
> commands:
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK
for
> now.
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should
be
>> a functional equivalent of the old one.
>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build
bot.
>>
>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the
staging.
>>
>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at
google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits
<
>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> They are online now -
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>
>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
buildbot.
>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful,
but it
>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
porting
>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that
earlier. I and
>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things
to use
>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
test
>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
buildbot
>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that
you can
>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements
of the
>>> script.
>>>
>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
need
>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201013/ef8b9dd7/attachment.html>

I switched sanitizers and two rnk@ bots back to the primary server.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 22:42, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
wrote:
> They do on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>
> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
annotated
>> commands:
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but
that's OK for
>> now.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at
gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
should
>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production
build bot.
>>>
>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the
staging.
>>>
>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Galina
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at
google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via
lldb-commits <
>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
buildbot.
>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something
useful, but it
>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
porting
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that
earlier. I and
>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting
things to use
>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the
flexibility to test
>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting
the buildbot
>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script
that you can
>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep
requirements of the
>>>> script.
>>>>
>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
need
>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201014/327f57ee/attachment.html>

Thanks everyone!

I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if everything
is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you move all the
green bots back there.

Thanks

Galina


On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
wrote:
> They do on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>
> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
annotated
>> commands:
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but
that's OK for
>> now.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at
gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
should
>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production
build bot.
>>>
>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the
staging.
>>>
>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Galina
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at
google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via
lldb-commits <
>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
buildbot.
>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something
useful, but it
>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
porting
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that
earlier. I and
>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting
things to use
>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the
flexibility to test
>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting
the buildbot
>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script
that you can
>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep
requirements of the
>>>> script.
>>>>
>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
need
>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201014/bf819357/attachment.html>