Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-12 18:39 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. >That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201012/c3f4f389/attachment.html>
Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-13 02:19 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a functional equivalent of the old one. We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. Please let me know when that could be arranged. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < > lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will >> need more love and care. >> >> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >> AnnotatedCommand. >> > > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and > another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use > more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test > steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot > master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can > run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the > script. > > I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some > help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201012/bde70b7a/attachment.html>
Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-13 04:38 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. > > For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand > directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. > > Please let me know when that could be arranged. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> They are online now - >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will >>> need more love and care. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>> AnnotatedCommand. >>> >> >> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >> script. >> >> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some >> help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201012/cc5036b5/attachment-0001.html>
Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-13 18:11 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated commands: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. > > For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand > directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. > > Please let me know when that could be arranged. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> They are online now - >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will >>> need more love and care. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>> AnnotatedCommand. >>> >> >> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >> script. >> >> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some >> help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201013/fe9db856/attachment.html>