llvm dev - Sep 2020 - [cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Apparently reviewable.io requests full permissions to control the
> repository and its settings.
>
I noticed that, too.

I guess that if it wants to keep a full history of all force-rebases it may
need to create sub-branches for the pull requests, as well as to approve
pull requests themselves, which need at least write access.

I personally found the interface very confusing, but that could just be
that I'm not used to it. However, that also means other people may be put
out by the tool and avoid contributing...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200916/15a838c6/attachment.html>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020, 2:16 AM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 09:37, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Apparently reviewable.io requests full permissions to control the
>> repository and its settings.
>>
>
> I noticed that, too.
>
> I guess that if it wants to keep a full history of all force-rebases it
> may need to create sub-branches for the pull requests, as well as to
> approve pull requests themselves, which need at least write access.
>
> I personally found the interface very confusing, but that could just be
> that I'm not used to it. However, that also means other people may be
put
> out by the tool and avoid contributing...
>
I'm not sure on this either yet. Preliminarily, as someone who first used
phab within the last couple of years, the "this isn't what I'm used
to"
hurdle wasn't greater than my memory of getting up to speed on the phab
flow. But, with a total of two reviews drafted, I'm hardly at the point of
advocating for it -- but I did find the experience positive.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200916/e648f4fc/attachment.html>

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:23, Stella Laurenzo <stellaraccident at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm not sure on this either yet. Preliminarily, as someone who first
used
> phab within the last couple of years, the "this isn't what I'm
used to"
> hurdle wasn't greater than my memory of getting up to speed on the phab
> flow. But, with a total of two reviews drafted, I'm hardly at the point
of
> advocating for it -- but I did find the experience positive.
>
That's great feedback, thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200916/aa7836f9/attachment.html>