Alexey Zhikhartsev via llvm-dev
2019-Feb-19 20:14 UTC
[llvm-dev] Reserved/Unallocatable registers
Hi everybody, It doesn't look like people reached a consensus in the following discussion on the rules for reserved and unallocatable registers: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095947.html Does the last message from Matthias reflect the status quo? http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095999.html Best, Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190219/e2248ff8/attachment.html>
Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev
2019-Feb-19 23:30 UTC
[llvm-dev] Reserved/Unallocatable registers
Hi Alex, There was a bit more discussion after Matthias' last email, but I don’t remember the conclusion on top of my heads and I don’t people we posted the final version. What do you want to know? Cheers, -Quentin> On Feb 19, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Alexey Zhikhartsev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > It doesn't look like people reached a consensus in the following discussion on the rules for reserved and unallocatable registers: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095947.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095947.html> > > Does the last message from Matthias reflect the status quo? > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095999.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-February/095999.html> > > Best, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190219/ad3dc361/attachment.html>