llvm dev - Dec 2017 - possible violation of the LLVM-license in commercial product

Dear All,
while digging around in the machine code of a forex trading program I 
found that they use llvm for their plugin intrastructure. But neither in 
their documentation nor in the distrubuted files are mentions of the 
LLVM-license. In my opinion this is a violation of the condition: 
"Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright 
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimers in the 
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution."
Can you please tell me how to handle this case? Does anyone have 
experience with such cases and is willing to have a look at the present 
case in detail?
Best Wishes
Robert

> On Dec 20, 2017, at 1:51 AM, robert via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> while digging around in the machine code of a forex trading program I found
that they use llvm for their plugin intrastructure. But neither in their
documentation nor in the distrubuted files are mentions of the LLVM-license. In
my opinion this is a violation of the condition: "Redistributions in binary
form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
following disclaimers in the documentation and/or other materials provided with
the distribution."
> Can you please tell me how to handle this case? Does anyone have experience
with such cases and is willing to have a look at the present case in detail?
I’d suggest politely pointing this out to them through some official channel and
ask them to fix that.  It is probably a simple oversight and they may have
included it in a place that you haven’t found.  If missing, they just need to
add it to some documentation they include (for example).

-Chris