I don't object to backporting the fix. But I think the FDR itself is not in
4.0 yet. Let Dean suggest how risky FDR may be: I see substantial code
changes, but for the old code they seem to be mostly moving.
Dean, if you're on vacation, I can submit the compare_exchange_strong() fix.
Cheers,
Serge
On 27 January 2017 at 19:52, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 26 January 2017 at 22:18, Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Yeah, I was being optimistic about this one. It should be changed to
> strong
> > if he weak version doesn't quite do it.
> >
> > The other way to do this is to change the test to do the polling, but
> that
> > seems sub-optimal.
>
> I agree.
>
> Do you guys think we can get that backported in 4.0?
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170127/ebbf0d1c/attachment.html>