Hi folks, It seems all LNT buildbots are broken due to the error: error: The 'six==1.9.0' distribution was not found and is required by LNT The module seems to be in version 1.10 and probably the old binary is no longer there. Do we really need it to be 1.9? Can't that be >1.9? cheers, --renato
> 1.9 is fine I think. We don’t use it directly as far as I know, it is just a transitive dependency.On January 23, 2017 at 10:25:11 AM, Renato Golin (renato.golin at linaro.org) wrote: Hi folks, It seems all LNT buildbots are broken due to the error: error: The 'six==1.9.0' distribution was not found and is required by LNT The module seems to be in version 1.10 and probably the old binary is no longer there. Do we really need it to be 1.9? Can't that be >1.9? cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170123/faf6d329/attachment.html>
On 23 January 2017 at 18:47, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:>> 1.9 is fine I think. We don’t use it directly as far as I know, it is >> just a transitive dependency.http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-quick http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-full http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf All with the same error message... We clean the sandbox and start a new one on every build, just to be sure, so cleaning up won't help. Any ideas? --renato
Hopefully fixed in r292852. On January 23, 2017 at 11:04:08 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev (llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org) wrote: On 23 January 2017 at 18:47, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:>> 1.9 is fine I think. We don’t use it directly as far as I know, it is >> just a transitive dependency.http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-quick http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-full http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf All with the same error message... We clean the sandbox and start a new one on every build, just to be sure, so cleaning up won't help. Any ideas? --renato _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170123/6af296e0/attachment.html>
Worked, thanks! On 23 Jan 2017 11:45 p.m., "Chris Matthews" <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:> Hopefully fixed in r292852. > > > On January 23, 2017 at 11:04:08 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev ( > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org) wrote: > > On 23 January 2017 at 18:47, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> > wrote: > >> 1.9 is fine I think. We don’t use it directly as far as I know, it is > >> just a transitive dependency. > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-quick > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-full > > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf > > All with the same error message... We clean the sandbox and start a > new one on every build, just to be sure, so cleaning up won't help. > > Any ideas? > > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170124/fc85ac8e/attachment.html>