Sebastian Pop via llvm-dev
2016-Oct-14 22:05 UTC
[llvm-dev] [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> >> To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> >> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, >> "Matthias Braun" <matze at braunis.de>, "Clang Dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "nd" <nd at arm.com>, "Abe Skolnik" >> <a.skolnik at samsung.com> >> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:36:12 AM >> Subject: Re: [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" >> >> On 14 October 2016 at 15:50, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > These 3 tests are passing with the following configurations: >> > -O3 -ffp-contract=off >> > -O3 -ffp-contract=on >> > -O0 -ffp-contract=off >> > -O0 -ffp-contract=on >> > >> > They are not passing at: >> > -Ofast -ffp-contract=on >> > -Ofast -ffp-contract=off >> >> Let's separate completely FP-contract and fast-math. They're >> different >> things and need different solutions. >> >> >> > if(TEST_SUITE_USES_FAST_MATH) >> > add_definitions(-DFP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0) >> > else() >> > add_definitions(-DFP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e-5) >> > endif() >> >> This doesn't make sense. If my program decreased precision by 5 >> orders >> of magnitude with -ffast-math, I'd be *very* worried. > > Is this an absolute or a relative tolerance? If this is absolute, as the name implies, then I'm not sure how to feel. We should probably use a relative tolerance where possible. >This is absolute tolerance: here is the code I'm using to check. double V1 = A[i][j]; double V2 = B[i][j]; double Diff = fabs(V1 - V2); if (Diff > AbsTolerance) { fprintf(stderr, "A[%d][%d] = %lf and B[%d][%d] = %lf differ more than" " FP_ABSTOLERANCE = %lf\n", i, j, V1, i, j, V2, AbsTolerance); return 0; } Do you want me to add the relative tolerance for the 2 tests? polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e1 polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0 What should be a good relative tolerance to set for these two tests? Here is the code to compute the relative tolerance from fpcmp: // Check to see if these are inside the absolute tolerance if (AbsTolerance < fabs(V1-V2)) { // Nope, check the relative tolerance... double Diff; if (V2) Diff = fabs(V1/V2 - 1.0); else if (V1) Diff = fabs(V2/V1 - 1.0); else Diff = 0; // Both zero. if (Diff > RelTolerance) { fprintf(stderr, ("%s: Compared: %e and %e\n" "abs. diff = %e rel.diff = %e\n" "Out of tolerance: rel/abs: %e/%e\n"), g_program, V1, V2, fabs(V1-V2), Diff, RelTolerance, AbsTolerance); return true; } }> -Hal > >> >> I hope that fast-math in Clang isn't that broken, so that's probably >> to do with the assumptions in the output reduction phase. >> >> But, as I said, let's do Ofast *later*. One thing at a time.Agreed. I will update the patch, make sure all Polybench pass with "-O3 -ffp-contract=on/off" and it will be ready to commit. Thanks, Sebastian
Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
2016-Oct-14 22:10 UTC
[llvm-dev] [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
----- Original Message -----> From: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>, "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Matthias Braun" <matze at braunis.de>, "Clang Dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "nd" > <nd at arm.com>, "Abe Skolnik" <a.skolnik at samsung.com> > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:05:01 PM > Subject: Re: [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > >> To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> > >> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Sebastian Paul Pop" > >> <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, > >> "Matthias Braun" <matze at braunis.de>, "Clang Dev" > >> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "nd" <nd at arm.com>, "Abe Skolnik" > >> <a.skolnik at samsung.com> > >> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:36:12 AM > >> Subject: Re: [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with > >> "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" > >> > >> On 14 October 2016 at 15:50, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > These 3 tests are passing with the following configurations: > >> > -O3 -ffp-contract=off > >> > -O3 -ffp-contract=on > >> > -O0 -ffp-contract=off > >> > -O0 -ffp-contract=on > >> > > >> > They are not passing at: > >> > -Ofast -ffp-contract=on > >> > -Ofast -ffp-contract=off > >> > >> Let's separate completely FP-contract and fast-math. They're > >> different > >> things and need different solutions. > >> > >> > >> > if(TEST_SUITE_USES_FAST_MATH) > >> > add_definitions(-DFP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0) > >> > else() > >> > add_definitions(-DFP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e-5) > >> > endif() > >> > >> This doesn't make sense. If my program decreased precision by 5 > >> orders > >> of magnitude with -ffast-math, I'd be *very* worried. > > > > Is this an absolute or a relative tolerance? If this is absolute, > > as the name implies, then I'm not sure how to feel. We should > > probably use a relative tolerance where possible. > > > > This is absolute tolerance: here is the code I'm using to check. > > double V1 = A[i][j]; > double V2 = B[i][j]; > double Diff = fabs(V1 - V2); > if (Diff > AbsTolerance) { > fprintf(stderr, "A[%d][%d] = %lf and B[%d][%d] = %lf differ > more than" > " FP_ABSTOLERANCE = %lf\n", i, j, V1, i, j, V2, > AbsTolerance); > return 0; > } > > Do you want me to add the relative tolerance for the 2 tests? > polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e1 > polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0 > What should be a good relative tolerance to set for these two tests?What's the minimum relative tolerance that you need for them to pass? -Hal> > Here is the code to compute the relative tolerance from fpcmp: > > // Check to see if these are inside the absolute tolerance > if (AbsTolerance < fabs(V1-V2)) { > // Nope, check the relative tolerance... > double Diff; > if (V2) > Diff = fabs(V1/V2 - 1.0); > else if (V1) > Diff = fabs(V2/V1 - 1.0); > else > Diff = 0; // Both zero. > if (Diff > RelTolerance) { > fprintf(stderr, ("%s: Compared: %e and %e\n" > "abs. diff = %e rel.diff = %e\n" > "Out of tolerance: rel/abs: %e/%e\n"), > g_program, V1, V2, fabs(V1-V2), Diff, RelTolerance, > AbsTolerance); > return true; > } > } > > > -Hal > > > >> > >> I hope that fast-math in Clang isn't that broken, so that's > >> probably > >> to do with the assumptions in the output reduction phase. > >> > >> But, as I said, let's do Ofast *later*. One thing at a time. > > Agreed. I will update the patch, make sure all Polybench pass with > "-O3 -ffp-contract=on/off" and it will be ready to commit. > > Thanks, > Sebastian >-- Hal Finkel Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
Sebastian Pop via llvm-dev
2016-Oct-15 00:05 UTC
[llvm-dev] [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:> Agreed. I will update the patch, make sure all Polybench pass with > "-O3 -ffp-contract=on/off" and it will be ready to commit.I updated the patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D25346 Ok to commit as it is now, and then address the other problems with -ffast-math in followup patches? Thanks, Sebastian
Sebastian Pop via llvm-dev
2016-Oct-20 15:05 UTC
[llvm-dev] [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:>> polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e1 >> polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0 >> What should be a good relative tolerance to set for these two tests? > > What's the minimum relative tolerance that you need for them to pass?Setting FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e-5, the two tests are passing when compiled with -Ofast for the following relative tolerance: polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_TOLERANCE=1e-10 polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt, FP_TOLERANCE=1e5 gramschmidt passes validation against reference output, symm does not pass validation against reference output: I have opened a bug for that: "__attribute__((optnone)) not respected with -ffast-math or -Ofast" https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30745 Sebastian
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
- [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
- [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
- [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
- [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"