----- Original Message -----> From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Rafael Espíndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:50:33 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Lanai backend > > On 10 February 2016 at 13:42, Rafael Espíndola > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai > > being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of > > experimental when there is desire for that? > > +1I agree. -Hal> > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
On 02/10/2016 06:04 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> To: "Rafael Espíndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> >> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:50:33 AM >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Lanai backend >> >> On 10 February 2016 at 13:42, Rafael Espíndola >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai >>> being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of >>> experimental when there is desire for that? >> +1 > I agree.Same. Philip> > -Hal > >> --renato >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 9:04 AM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On 02/10/2016 06:04 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>> To: "Rafael Espíndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> >>> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:50:33 AM >>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Lanai backend >>> >>> On 10 February 2016 at 13:42, Rafael Espíndola >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai >>>> being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of >>>> experimental when there is desire for that? >>> +1 >> I agree. > Same.+1 -Chris