> Yes, I think this is a reasonable point. The cheapest SystemZ system is somewhere around $75K, so widespread availability isn’t really a relevant criteria for accepting that.And SystemZ is hopefully a good comparison in that is a new and well isolated backend. Ever since it went in I can remember only ever discussing 1 or 2 patches, and the last case pushed me to improving common code (r255902). Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of experimental when there is desire for that? Cheers, Rafael
On 10 February 2016 at 13:42, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai > being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of > experimental when there is desire for that?+1 --renato
----- Original Message -----> From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Rafael Espíndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:50:33 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Lanai backend > > On 10 February 2016 at 13:42, Rafael Espíndola > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Is it a good summary of the thread that everyone is OK with Lanai > > being an experimental backend and we can discuss taking it out of > > experimental when there is desire for that? > > +1I agree. -Hal> > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory