Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-05 10:50 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged
Here's the status for my builds so far. clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz (sha1sum: 2b546efa5bab19d6711771ef31711d07b4a3f23f) Native: All ok Cross compiling to various MIPS targets: 16 out of 23 configs passed 1 out of the remaining 7 failed a small number of tests with a timeout. I expect these will pass when I re-run them. Remaining 6 configs still running... clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: b46221e1bb54255e9e060f06bb72bb2ba630ff15) Failed to run check-all due to tsan'd libc++ build failing PR26278 - My fix for this was committed just after the rc2 tag so in order to get some check-all results, I applied those four patches (r25966[1456]) and re-ran check-all. PR26369 - Several failures related to the lack of -latomic which is needed for 64-bit atomics. PR26476 - One new failure in libc++ (I probably just missed it amongst the others). Apparently std::regex_traits says that '-' doesn't belong to the 'w' class but only on big-endian. check-all appears to hang at 99%. I'll look into this. LNT (using the clean rc2) 1 of 3 passed successfully, the other two are still running clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: 9f89cccfdb5cf6a27138b84a631003c4a04f456d) Build almost ok. I only have failures related to PR26369. LNT just started.> -----Original Message----- > From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Hans > Wennborg via lldb-dev > Sent: 02 February 2016 21:16 > To: release-testers at lists.llvm.org > Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev > Subject: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged > > Dear testers, > > Release Candidate 2 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and > upload to the sftp. > > I know there are still outstanding issues from RC1, but there have > been a lot of merges going into the branch and I think it's time for > another round of RC testing. > > This RC comes a little behind schedule, sorry about that, but I'm > still optimistic about hitting the target of releasing towards the end > of February. > > Thanks for all the work you've put into this release so far! > > Hans > > [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016- > February/009739.html > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
Nikola Smiljanic via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-05 11:04 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged
Fedora looks OK, openSUSE not so much, check gets stuck at 90% on x64 but test suite passes OK, on x86 build succeeds but test suite fails saying 'import spec' no module found. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Sanders via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Here's the status for my builds so far. > > clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz (sha1sum: > 2b546efa5bab19d6711771ef31711d07b4a3f23f) > Native: > All ok > Cross compiling to various MIPS targets: > 16 out of 23 configs passed > 1 out of the remaining 7 failed a small number of tests > with a timeout. I expect these will pass when I re-run them. > Remaining 6 configs still running... > > clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: > b46221e1bb54255e9e060f06bb72bb2ba630ff15) > Failed to run check-all due to tsan'd libc++ build failing > PR26278 - My fix for this was committed just after the rc2 > tag so in order to get some check-all results, I applied those four patches > (r25966[1456]) and re-ran check-all. > PR26369 - Several failures related to the lack of -latomic > which is needed for 64-bit atomics. > PR26476 - One new failure in libc++ (I probably just > missed it amongst the others). Apparently std::regex_traits says that '-' > doesn't belong to the 'w' class but only on big-endian. > check-all appears to hang at 99%. I'll look into this. > LNT (using the clean rc2) > 1 of 3 passed successfully, the other two are still running > > clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: > 9f89cccfdb5cf6a27138b84a631003c4a04f456d) > Build almost ok. I only have failures related to PR26369. > LNT just started. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Hans > > Wennborg via lldb-dev > > Sent: 02 February 2016 21:16 > > To: release-testers at lists.llvm.org > > Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev > > Subject: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged > > > > Dear testers, > > > > Release Candidate 2 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and > > upload to the sftp. > > > > I know there are still outstanding issues from RC1, but there have > > been a lot of merges going into the branch and I think it's time for > > another round of RC testing. > > > > This RC comes a little behind schedule, sorry about that, but I'm > > still optimistic about hitting the target of releasing towards the end > > of February. > > > > Thanks for all the work you've put into this release so far! > > > > Hans > > > > [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016- > > February/009739.html > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160205/028a4db6/attachment.html>