Anmol Paralkar (anmparal) via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-02 00:26 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM/clang vs. GCC: Warning Parity.
Hi, I attempted to gauge warning parity between LLVM/clang 3.8.0 (early Jan trunk) and GCC 5.3.0 using the DejaGNU suites: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg and gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common PFA, the tabulated results. These are still preliminary - it is possible that there exist equivalent LLVM/clang warning options to be used instead of the GCC warning options I used. I'd appreciate receiving feedback and if these are indeed gaps, is the community aware of them and are they being addressed? I also need input on the documentation to be used for LLVM/clang warning options; for, unlike GCC's: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#options-to-control-error-and-warning-messages - is not as exhaustive. Thanks very much. Regards, Anmol. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160202/c6ae6c45/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: taxonomy-preliminary.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160202/c6ae6c45/attachment-0001.txt>