Hi, I have created the 3.5.2-final tag. There were no changes between -rc1 and -final. In previous releases, when there were no changes between -rc1 and -final, I just dropped -rc1 from the binary names and used those as the official binaries. However, this time I'm going to try something different and ask the testers to re-build binaries from the -final tag. The reasons for doing this are: 1. It makes my life easier and prevents me from making mistakes renaming the binaries. 2. It avoids having the -rc1 tag displayed as part of the clang version. I realize this makes extra work for testers, but I don't think it should be too bad since only the binaries need to be built and the regression testing can be skipped. If you don't like this new approach let me know, and I won't do it next time. Thanks, Tom
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:11 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:> Hi, > > I have created the 3.5.2-final tag. There were no changes between -rc1 > and -final.Uploaded clang+llvm-3.5.2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz Ben
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Hi, > > I have created the 3.5.2-final tag. There were no changes between -rc1 > and -final.Uploaded Win binary: bcb3e6c580be088776988847a7a7619f8fd86812 LLVM-3.5.2-win32.exe Build script attached for posterity. Cheers, Hans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: build_llvm_352._bat_ Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2384 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150325/4591eb1c/attachment.obj>
Uploaded clang+llvm-3.5.2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz and clang+llvm-3.5.2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Tom Stellard [tom at stellard.net] Sent: 25 March 2015 03:11 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] 3.5.2-final tag created Hi, I have created the 3.5.2-final tag. There were no changes between -rc1 and -final. In previous releases, when there were no changes between -rc1 and -final, I just dropped -rc1 from the binary names and used those as the official binaries. However, this time I'm going to try something different and ask the testers to re-build binaries from the -final tag. The reasons for doing this are: 1. It makes my life easier and prevents me from making mistakes renaming the binaries. 2. It avoids having the -rc1 tag displayed as part of the clang version. I realize this makes extra work for testers, but I don't think it should be too bad since only the binaries need to be built and the regression testing can be skipped. If you don't like this new approach let me know, and I won't do it next time. Thanks, Tom _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
ARM/AArch64 uploaded. On 25 March 2015 at 03:11, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Hi, > > I have created the 3.5.2-final tag. There were no changes between -rc1 > and -final. > > In previous releases, when there were no changes between -rc1 and > -final, I just dropped -rc1 from the binary names and used those as the > official binaries. However, this time I'm going to try something > different and ask the testers to re-build binaries from the -final tag. > The reasons for doing this are: > > 1. It makes my life easier and prevents me from making mistakes renaming > the binaries. > > 2. It avoids having the -rc1 tag displayed as part of the clang > version. > > > I realize this makes extra work for testers, but I don't think it should > be too bad since only the binaries need to be built and the regression > testing can be skipped. > > If you don't like this new approach let me know, and I won't do it > next time. > > Thanks, > Tom > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Hi,
I uploaded
MD5 (clang+llvm-3.5.2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz) =
ab5d8b1f35686834af8ba9f9847e078e
All tests passed.
Cheers,
Sebastian
> On 25.03.2015, at 04:11, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have created the 3.5.2-final tag. There were no changes between -rc1
> and -final.
>
> In previous releases, when there were no changes between -rc1 and
> -final, I just dropped -rc1 from the binary names and used those as the
> official binaries. However, this time I'm going to try something
> different and ask the testers to re-build binaries from the -final tag.
> The reasons for doing this are:
>
> 1. It makes my life easier and prevents me from making mistakes renaming
> the binaries.
>
> 2. It avoids having the -rc1 tag displayed as part of the clang
> version.
>
>
> I realize this makes extra work for testers, but I don't think it
should
> be too bad since only the binaries need to be built and the regression
> testing can be skipped.
>
> If you don't like this new approach let me know, and I won't do it
> next time.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev