Chris Bieneman
2015-Feb-18 22:39 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
Galina and Takumi, Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? -Chris> On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. >> >> Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. >> How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com <mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com>> wrote: >> I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. >> >> I will update my cmake from 2.8.12.1 to 2.8.12.2 soon. >> >> 2015-02-10 7:54 GMT+09:00 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com <mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com>>: >> > I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. >> > >> > 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com <mailto:aaron at aaronballman.com>>: >> >> Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) >> >> >> >> ~Aaron >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> +Galina, and Takumi >> >>> >> >>> This was a very short lived change :-). >> >>> >> >>> Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. >> >>> >> >>> -Chris >> >>> >> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters should all >> >>>> be running 2.8.12.2 or later. >> >>>> >> >>>> Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install packages >> >>>> from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> OK, so its analogous to Windows. SGTM. (and no, I don't think you need to >> >>> wait for further review of patches) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >> >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/> >> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150218/6310b7b9/attachment.html>
NAKAMURA Takumi
2015-Feb-18 23:11 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
Ready, for me. 2015-02-19 7:39 GMT+09:00 Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>:> Galina and Takumi, > > Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? > > -Chris > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because > of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. > > Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. > How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. >> >> I will update my cmake from 2.8.12.1 to 2.8.12.2 soon. >> >> 2015-02-10 7:54 GMT+09:00 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: >> > I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. >> > >> > 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: >> >> Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) >> >> >> >> ~Aaron >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> +Galina, and Takumi >> >>> >> >>> This was a very short lived change :-). >> >>> >> >>> Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. >> >>> >> >>> -Chris >> >>> >> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters should >> >>>> all >> >>>> be running 2.8.12.2 or later. >> >>>> >> >>>> Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install >> >>>> packages >> >>>> from CMake.org. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> OK, so its analogous to Windows. SGTM. (and no, I don't think you need >> >>> to >> >>> wait for further review of patches) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >> >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >
Galina Kistanova
2015-Feb-20 20:37 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
Ready on my side. Thanks Galina On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:> Galina and Takumi, > > Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? > > -Chris > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 > because of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. > > Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with > LLVM. > How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. >> >> I will update my cmake from 2.8.12.1 to 2.8.12.2 soon. >> >> 2015-02-10 7:54 GMT+09:00 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>: >> > I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. >> > >> > 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: >> >> Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) >> >> >> >> ~Aaron >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +Galina, and Takumi >> >>> >> >>> This was a very short lived change :-). >> >>> >> >>> Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. >> >>> >> >>> -Chris >> >>> >> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters >> should all >> >>>> be running 2.8.12.2 or later. >> >>>> >> >>>> Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install >> packages >> >>>> from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> OK, so its analogous to Windows. SGTM. (and no, I don't think you >> need to >> >>> wait for further review of patches) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >> >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150220/7b9365bf/attachment.html>
Chris Bieneman
2015-Feb-20 21:31 UTC
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
I just landed r230062, which sets the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2. I’ve also sent corresponding patches to cfe-commits (http://reviews.llvm.org/D7797 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D7797>). If there are any problems I will revert. Thanks, -Chris> On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ready on my side. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > Galina and Takumi, > > Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? > > -Chris > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release. >> >> -Chris >> >> >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. >>> >>> Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. >>> How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com <mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. >>> >>> I will update my cmake from 2.8.12.1 to 2.8.12.2 soon. >>> >>> 2015-02-10 7:54 GMT+09:00 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com <mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com>>: >>> > I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. >>> > >>> > 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com <mailto:aaron at aaronballman.com>>: >>> >> Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) >>> >> >>> >> ~Aaron >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> +Galina, and Takumi >>> >>> >>> >>> This was a very short lived change :-). >>> >>> >>> >>> Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters should all >>> >>>> be running 2.8.12.2 or later. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install packages >>> >>>> from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OK, so its analogous to Windows. SGTM. (and no, I don't think you need to >>> >>> wait for further review of patches) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/> >>> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev> > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150220/d69348c9/attachment.html>