Hello testers, RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. Thanks, Hans
On 18 February 2015 at 23:26, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.Ok, this issue might not have been solved... The test: test/CodeGen/R600/Output/infinite-loop-evergreen.ll Is actually in an infinite loop on AArch64... This is RC4 Phase3. I didn't see that on RC3. I'll kill the test and proceed with the test-suite, but I'm not sure we found all problems. cheers, --renato
On 19 February 2015 at 13:57, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> test/CodeGen/R600/Output/infinite-loop-evergreen.ll > > Is actually in an infinite loop on AArch64... This is RC4 Phase3. I > didn't see that on RC3.Well, I spoke too early. Apparently the test finished after 8 minutes running... Is that expected? 8 minutes is longer than it takes to run the whole check-all on that box... cheers, --renato
On 18 February 2015 at 23:26, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).AArch64 binaries uploaded. Apart from the long-lasting infinite-loop test, everything else was fine. ARM binaries still building. cheers, --renato
On 19 Feb 2015, at 15:28, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> > On 18 February 2015 at 23:26, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > AArch64 binaries uploaded. Apart from the long-lasting infinite-loop > test, everything else was fine. > > ARM binaries still building.No problems encountered on FreeBSD 10. I have uploaded these files to SFTP: SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = e38ff54a9fb9fbe20751c08783821bcc3416eb1961a799e1099857c456d9f396 SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 161e187eeb790a52fb07b508485c89f214dbcd03794e0cdff522cae97610e889 -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150219/03b7c901/attachment.sig>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:> Hello testers, > > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. > > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. > > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.Windows binary uploaded to the sftp: $ sha1sum LLVM-3.6.0-rc4-win32.exe 4ae208f78c403c00cccdd9a65020df4ac277f189 LLVM-3.6.0-rc4-win32.exe It was built with the attached script. - Hans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: build_llvm_360._bat_ Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2380 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150219/0389b8b8/attachment.obj>
On 19 February 2015 at 14:28, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> AArch64 binaries uploaded. Apart from the long-lasting infinite-loop > test, everything else was fine.ARM binaries up. All green. --renato
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 07:26 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:> Hello testers, > > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. > > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. > > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. >Everything looks fine on x86_64 ubuntu-14.04 Uploaded: clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz Ben
Fedora and openSUSE look good, upload in progress... On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote:> On Thursday, February 19, 2015 07:26 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > >> Hello testers, >> >> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). >> >> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed >> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap >> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. >> >> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to >> release. >> >> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. >> >> Everything looks fine on x86_64 ubuntu-14.04 > > Uploaded: clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz > > Ben >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150220/35b97d69/attachment.html>
Mips binaries uploaded. clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz All good clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and looks good so far though clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling to Mips) Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.> -----Original Message----- > From: hwennborg at google.com [mailto:hwennborg at google.com] On Behalf > Of Hans Wennborg > Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27 > To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian > Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić > Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev > Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged > > Hello testers, > > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. > > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. > > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. > > Thanks, > Hans
Renato and Daniel, how are you guys testing, are you using real hardware or emulation? I'm just curious about your setup. On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:> Mips binaries uploaded. > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz > All good > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a > broken symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way > through and looks good so far though > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling > to Mips) > Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 > configs I run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: hwennborg at google.com [mailto:hwennborg at google.com] On Behalf > > Of Hans Wennborg > > Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27 > > To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian > > Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić > > Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev > > Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged > > > > Hello testers, > > > > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > > > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. > > > > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to > release. > > > > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. > > > > Thanks, > > Hans >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150223/61561ab0/attachment.html>
Hi everyone, I'm a bit late but nevertheless: uploaded RC4 for OS X to SFTP with lights on green MD5 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz) 7a1d49b04f889d70b07ff8e4fc42a2f3 Cheers, Sebastian 2015-02-19 0:26 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>:> Hello testers, > > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. > > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. > > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. > > Thanks, > Hans
I've added them to the pre-release webpage. Cheers, Hans On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Sebastian Dreßler <sebastian.dressler at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi everyone, > > I'm a bit late but nevertheless: uploaded RC4 for OS X to SFTP with > lights on green > > MD5 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz) > 7a1d49b04f889d70b07ff8e4fc42a2f3 > > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > > 2015-02-19 0:26 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>: >> Hello testers, >> >> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). >> >> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed >> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap >> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. >> >> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. >> >> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. >> >> Thanks, >> Hans
Quick update before I move on to the final tag.> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken > symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and > looks good so far thoughDefault options were all good. Mips32 was about halfway but was good so far.> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling > to Mips) > Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I > run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.All ok here.> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders > Sent: 23 February 2015 10:41 > To: Hans Wennborg; Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; > Sebastian Dreßler; Nikola Smiljanić > Cc: cfe-dev; llvmdev > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged > > Mips binaries uploaded. > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz > All good > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken > symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and > looks good so far though > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling > to Mips) > Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I > run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: hwennborg at google.com [mailto:hwennborg at google.com] On > Behalf > > Of Hans Wennborg > > Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27 > > To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian > > Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić > > Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev > > Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged > > > > Hello testers, > > > > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). > > > > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed > > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap > > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. > > > > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to > release. > > > > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual. > > > > Thanks, > > Hans > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev