Hi, Given the following in ISDOpcodes.h SETO, // 0 1 1 1 True if ordered (no nans) SETUO, // 1 0 0 0 True if unordered: isnan(X) | isnan(Y) Is it safe to assume that SETO is not of SETUO? We have support for setuo in the architecture but not seto. Sirish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120710/5726ca3f/attachment.html>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Sirish Pande <spande at codeaurora.org> wrote:> Hi, > > > > Given the following in ISDOpcodes.h > > > > SETO, // 0 1 1 1 True if ordered (no nans) > > SETUO, // 1 0 0 0 True if unordered: isnan(X) | > isnan(Y) > > > > Is it safe to assume that SETO is not of SETUO? We have support for setuo > in the architecture but not seto.Yes; see http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_fcmp . -Eli