Ok, I attached it to the bug. For reference, here's what I'm using on unix as a workaround as long as this is not fixed: llvm-config --libfiles | xargs -n 1 -I {} sh -c 'test -f {} && echo {}' On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> wrote:> On 05/13/2012 02:46 AM, Keno Fischer wrote: > > Currently, there's a regression in llvm-config in both the 3.1 Release > > branch and trunk (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11886). The > > attached patch fixes that. It would be great if this could be reviewed > > and still integrated into 3.1. > > I'm giving this a bump as that PR is still listed as open and > unassigned. Keno, I think that you should post your suggested fix there. > > Who wrote the new llvm-config? Could the author please have a look at > this PR? > > -- > Dr. Albert Gr"af > Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany > Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de > WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120515/e1643cb0/attachment.html>
I put in two slightly different fixes that I believe should cover the problem: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=156837 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=156838 Let me know if your experience disagrees. I'll try and get these into 3.1 if Bill lets me after the buildbots give a check mark. - Daniel On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Keno Fischer <kenof at stanford.edu> wrote:> Ok, I attached it to the bug. For reference, here's what I'm using on unix > as a workaround as long as this is not fixed: > llvm-config --libfiles | xargs -n 1 -I {} sh -c 'test -f {} && echo {}' > > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> wrote: >> >> On 05/13/2012 02:46 AM, Keno Fischer wrote: >> > Currently, there's a regression in llvm-config in both the 3.1 Release >> > branch and trunk (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11886). The >> > attached patch fixes that. It would be great if this could be reviewed >> > and still integrated into 3.1. >> >> I'm giving this a bump as that PR is still listed as open and >> unassigned. Keno, I think that you should post your suggested fix there. >> >> Who wrote the new llvm-config? Could the author please have a look at >> this PR? >> >> -- >> Dr. Albert Gr"af >> Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany >> Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de >> WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
Consider me a buildbot for OS X and let me tell you it works great :). Thank you so very much. -Keno On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:> I put in two slightly different fixes that I believe should cover the > problem: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=156837 > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=156838 > > Let me know if your experience disagrees. I'll try and get these into > 3.1 if Bill lets me after the buildbots give a check mark. > > - Daniel > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Keno Fischer <kenof at stanford.edu> wrote: > > Ok, I attached it to the bug. For reference, here's what I'm using on > unix > > as a workaround as long as this is not fixed: > > llvm-config --libfiles | xargs -n 1 -I {} sh -c 'test -f {} && echo {}' > > > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> > wrote: > >> > >> On 05/13/2012 02:46 AM, Keno Fischer wrote: > >> > Currently, there's a regression in llvm-config in both the 3.1 Release > >> > branch and trunk (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11886). The > >> > attached patch fixes that. It would be great if this could be reviewed > >> > and still integrated into 3.1. > >> > >> I'm giving this a bump as that PR is still listed as open and > >> unassigned. Keno, I think that you should post your suggested fix there. > >> > >> Who wrote the new llvm-config? Could the author please have a look at > >> this PR? > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Albert Gr"af > >> Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany > >> Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de > >> WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag > >> _______________________________________________ > >> LLVM Developers mailing list > >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120515/03366001/attachment.html>