> Or, the front-end of my programming language has to analize the source > code, and convert it to LLVM-IR?Yes
Right, FlyLanguage. Thanks again for reply. :o) 2011/8/28 FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com>> Or, the front-end of my programming language has to analize the source >> code, and convert it to LLVM-IR? >> > > Yes >-- @geovanisouza92 - Geovani de Souza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110828/25a069c8/attachment.html>
Well, have you any idea about how I can implement rightly Unicode in C/C++? Thanks. 2011/8/28 FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com>> Or, the front-end of my programming language has to analize the source >> code, and convert it to LLVM-IR? >> > > Yes >-- @geovanisouza92 - Geovani de Souza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110828/505a8b10/attachment.html>
> Well, have you any idea about how I can implement rightly Unicode in C/C++?http://site.icu-project.org/
Am 28.08.2011 16:02, schrieb geovanisouza92 at gmail.com:> Well, have you any idea about how I can implement rightly Unicode in C/C++?What do you mean with "implement in C/C++"? If you mean adding libraries to C/C++ that correctly deal with Unicode: that's nothing you do with a compiler infrastructure. And probably duplicate work, since Unicode libraries already exist. If you mean making the C/C++ compiler understand Unicode string literals: either that's in the language standard and implemented by conformant compilers already, or it's not in the language standard, implementing it would deviate from the standard, and it would not be "rightly" implemented. (I'm not a C/C++ guy so I don't know whether it's actually in the standard, but if it isn't, I guess any compiler has extensions already.) Hm. Maybe we're talking at the wrong level here, so: What's the problem/need that you wish to address? Regards, Jo