Graham Reitz
2011-Apr-09 05:26 UTC
[LLVMdev] Has the Microchip PIC16 experimental backend been dropped from v2.9?
There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8. It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. Has that backend been dropped? Graham
Eli Friedman
2011-Apr-09 06:18 UTC
[LLVMdev] Has the Microchip PIC16 experimental backend been dropped from v2.9?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Graham Reitz <grahamreitz at me.com> wrote:> There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8. It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. > > Has that backend been dropped?Yes; commit message for r116190: "Per discussion with Sanjiv, remove the PIC16 target from mainline. When/if it comes back, it will be largely a rewrite, so keeping the old codebase in tree isn't helping anyone." -Eli
Anton Korobeynikov
2011-Apr-09 06:18 UTC
[LLVMdev] Has the Microchip PIC16 experimental backend been dropped from v2.9?
> Has that backend been dropped?Yes -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
Graham Reitz
2011-Apr-09 19:16 UTC
[LLVMdev] Has the Microchip PIC16 experimental backend been dropped from v2.9?
Thank you. I hope that it does come back. On Apr 9, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Graham Reitz <grahamreitz at me.com> wrote: >> There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8. It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. >> >> Has that backend been dropped? > > Yes; commit message for r116190: > "Per discussion with Sanjiv, remove the PIC16 target from mainline. When/if > it comes back, it will be largely a rewrite, so keeping the old codebase > in tree isn't helping anyone." > > -Eli