> Possibly the OCaml bindings are broken on Windows/MinGW. Try building > with cmake instead of configure&make. The cmake build ignores the OCaml > bindings.One does not need to use cmake build to disable buildings :) It is possible to configure with --enable-bindings=none. Also, I'd suggest to use at least LLVM release 2.8, not 2.7 one. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
Thanks a lot both of you. Using --enable-bindings=none, I could build and install LLVM 2.8 and gcc-4.2-2.8 source. However, in the bin directory, I get c++.exe, cpp.exe, gcc.exe, g++.exe instead of llvm-c++.exe, llvm-cpp.exe, llvm-gcc.exe, llvm-g++. Are they the same? Akramul --- On Tue, 21/12/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM installation in Windows To: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es> Cc: "akramul azim" <bijoy123_8 at yahoo.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Date: Tuesday, 21 December, 2010, 6:41 PM> Possibly the OCaml bindings are broken on Windows/MinGW. Try building > with cmake instead of configure&make. The cmake build ignores the OCaml > bindings.One does not need to use cmake build to disable buildings :) It is possible to configure with --enable-bindings=none. Also, I'd suggest to use at least LLVM release 2.8, not 2.7 one. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101221/fad9bda2/attachment.html>
Did you specify "--program-prefix=llvm-" on your configure line? That's what tells the llvm-gcc build to use the llvm-* names for the executables. -Jim On Dec 21, 2010, at 7:27 PM, akramul azim wrote:> Thanks a lot both of you. Using --enable-bindings=none, I could build and install LLVM 2.8 and gcc-4.2-2.8 source. However, in the bin directory, I get c++.exe, cpp.exe, gcc.exe, g++.exe instead of llvm-c++.exe, llvm-cpp.exe, llvm-gcc.exe, llvm-g++. Are they the same? > Akramul > > --- On Tue, 21/12/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM installation in Windows > To: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Cc: "akramul azim" <bijoy123_8 at yahoo.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Date: Tuesday, 21 December, 2010, 6:41 PM > > > Possibly the OCaml bindings are broken on Windows/MinGW. Try building > > with cmake instead of configure&make. The cmake build ignores the OCaml > > bindings. > One does not need to use cmake build to disable buildings :) It is > possible to configure with > --enable-bindings=none. > > Also, I'd suggest to use at least LLVM release 2.8, not 2.7 one. > > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev