On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Aaron Gray <
aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 18:04, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
wrote:
>
>> > For the windows sub-target is it safe to assume Microsoft's
linker is
>> the being targeted?
>> I'd really appreciate if both ms link and gnu ld will be tested, if
>> this is possible.
>
>
> I have done some tests with Cygwin, and most things seem okay, e.g. Static
> Constructors...Virtual Destructors.
>
> I did try building llvm-gcc on Cygwin with some hacks, but llvm-gcc
> requires some inline assembly, I may try and hack that through as assembly
> code.
>
> This involved linking and xgcc ran okay, so things are looking good :)
>
> Aaron
>
>
For dllexport support, there are differences between GNU's and
Microsoft's
linkers. I thought the the subtarget was their to differentiate what
tool-set was being targeted. I used that assumption on my patch to update
the support for dllexport.
-Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100511/c53812ba/attachment.html>