Dear developers: When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an assertion. The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: bb: ; preds = %bb1 %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] %3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str3, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] br label %bb1 The code slice in verify-fixrace.cpp in attachment: cerr << "IsFirst Current Inst: " << *I; cerr << "IsFirst First Inst: " << *BB->begin(); I--; Output is: Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] Backward Visit BB: bb IsFirst Current Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173: llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>& llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy = llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off the beginning of an ilist!"' failed. 0 opt 0x08642be4 1 opt 0x08642f26 2 0xb7f7f420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 3 libc.so.6 0xb7d0ca01 abort + 257 4 libc.so.6 0xb7d0410e __assert_fail + 238 5 opt 0x08357997 llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--() + 87 6 opt 0x08367104 llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--(int) + 28 7 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f781be defens::verify_fixrace_stub::DFSBackward(llvm::Instruction*, std::string&, int, bool) + 826 8 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f78311 defens::verify_fixrace_stub::runOnBasicBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&) + 261 9 opt 0x085cdaf4 10 opt 0x085cee1c llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 250 11 opt 0x085cefb8 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 98 12 opt 0x085cd8a3 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 197 13 opt 0x085cf256 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 116 14 opt 0x085cf2af llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 27 15 opt 0x082f91d0 main + 4452 16 libc.so.6 0xb7cf6450 __libc_start_main + 224 17 opt 0x082e9c11 __gxx_personality_v0 + 849
Quoting hc2428 at columbia.edu: I am using LLVM-2.5. Here is the attachment.> Dear developers: > When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an > iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first > instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an > assertion. > > The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: > bb: ; preds = %bb1 > %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x > i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x > i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x > i8]* @.str3, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x > i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > br label %bb1 > > > The code slice in verify-fixrace.cpp in attachment: > > cerr << "IsFirst Current Inst: " << *I; > cerr << "IsFirst First Inst: " << *BB->begin(); > I--; > > > > Output is: > Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr > ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > Backward Visit BB: bb > IsFirst Current Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias > getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> > [#uses=0] > IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias > getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> > [#uses=0] > opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173: > llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>& > llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy > llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off > the beginning of an ilist!"' failed. > 0 opt 0x08642be4 > 1 opt 0x08642f26 > 2 0xb7f7f420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 > 3 libc.so.6 0xb7d0ca01 abort + 257 > 4 libc.so.6 0xb7d0410e __assert_fail + 238 > 5 opt 0x08357997 > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--() + 87 > 6 opt 0x08367104 > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--(int) + 28 > 7 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f781be > defens::verify_fixrace_stub::DFSBackward(llvm::Instruction*, > std::string&, int, bool) + 826 > 8 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f78311 > defens::verify_fixrace_stub::runOnBasicBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&) + 261 > 9 opt 0x085cdaf4 > 10 opt 0x085cee1c > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 250 > 11 opt 0x085cefb8 > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 98 > 12 opt 0x085cd8a3 > llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 197 > 13 opt 0x085cf256 > llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 116 > 14 opt 0x085cf2af > llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 27 > 15 opt 0x082f91d0 main + 4452 > 16 libc.so.6 0xb7cf6450 __libc_start_main + 224 > 17 opt 0x082e9c11 __gxx_personality_v0 + 849 > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bug.tar.gz Type: application/x-gzip-compressed Size: 4842 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090926/e8742696/attachment.bin>
On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote:> Dear developers: > When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an > iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first > instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an > assertion.Hi hc! are you on SVN trunk? Cheers, Gabor> > The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: > bb: ; preds = %bb1 > %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x > i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x > i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x > i8]* @.str3, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x > i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > br label %bb1 > > The code slice in verify-fixrace.cpp in attachment: > > cerr << "IsFirst Current Inst: " << *I; > cerr << "IsFirst First Inst: " << *BB->begin(); > I--; > > Output is: > Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr > ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > Backward Visit BB: bb > IsFirst Current Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias > getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> > [#uses=0] > IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias > getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> > [#uses=0] > opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173: > llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>& > llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy = > llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off > the beginning of an ilist!"' failed. > 0 opt 0x08642be4 > 1 opt 0x08642f26 > 2 0xb7f7f420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 > 3 libc.so.6 0xb7d0ca01 abort + 257 > 4 libc.so.6 0xb7d0410e __assert_fail + 238 > 5 opt 0x08357997 > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--() + 87 > 6 opt 0x08367104 > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--(int) + 28 > 7 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f781be > defens::verify_fixrace_stub::DFSBackward(llvm::Instruction*, > std::string&, int, bool) + 826 > 8 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f78311 > defens::verify_fixrace_stub::runOnBasicBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&) + 261 > 9 opt 0x085cdaf4 > 10 opt 0x085cee1c > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 250 > 11 opt 0x085cefb8 > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 98 > 12 opt 0x085cd8a3 > llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 197 > 13 opt 0x085cf256 > llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 116 > 14 opt 0x085cf2af > llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 27 > 15 opt 0x082f91d0 main + 4452 > 16 libc.so.6 0xb7cf6450 __libc_start_main + 224 > 17 opt 0x082e9c11 __gxx_personality_v0 + 849 > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Quoting Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com>: Hi Gabor, I am using the release version of 2.5> On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote: >> Dear developers: >> When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an >> iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first >> instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an >> assertion. > > Hi hc! > > are you on SVN trunk? > > Cheers, > > Gabor > >> >> The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: >> bb: ; preds = %bb1 >> %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x >> i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x >> i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> %3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x >> i8]* @.str3, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x >> i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> br label %bb1 >> >> The code slice in verify-fixrace.cpp in attachment: >> >> cerr << "IsFirst Current Inst: " << *I; >> cerr << "IsFirst First Inst: " << *BB->begin(); >> I--; >> >> Output is: >> Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr >> ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> Backward Visit BB: bb >> IsFirst Current Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias >> getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind >> ; <i32> >> [#uses=0] >> IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias >> getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind >> ; <i32> >> [#uses=0] >> opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173: >> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>& >> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy = >> llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off >> the beginning of an ilist!"' failed. >> 0 opt 0x08642be4 >> 1 opt 0x08642f26 >> 2 0xb7f7f420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 >> 3 libc.so.6 0xb7d0ca01 abort + 257 >> 4 libc.so.6 0xb7d0410e __assert_fail + 238 >> 5 opt 0x08357997 >> llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--() + 87 >> 6 opt 0x08367104 >> llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--(int) + 28 >> 7 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f781be >> defens::verify_fixrace_stub::DFSBackward(llvm::Instruction*, >> std::string&, int, bool) + 826 >> 8 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f78311 >> defens::verify_fixrace_stub::runOnBasicBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&) + 261 >> 9 opt 0x085cdaf4 >> 10 opt 0x085cee1c >> llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 250 >> 11 opt 0x085cefb8 >> llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 98 >> 12 opt 0x085cd8a3 >> llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 197 >> 13 opt 0x085cf256 >> llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 116 >> 14 opt 0x085cf2af >> llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 27 >> 15 opt 0x082f91d0 main + 4452 >> 16 libc.so.6 0xb7cf6450 __libc_start_main + 224 >> 17 opt 0x082e9c11 __gxx_personality_v0 + 849 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >
AAAH! I see you are still at 2.5. Then this patch (the fix) is relevant for you: <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/ADT/ ilist.h?r1=66061&r2=68785&diff_format=h> Cheers, Gabor On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote:> Dear developers: > When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an > iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first > instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an > assertion. > > The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: > bb: ; preds = %bb1 > %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x > i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x > i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x > i8]* @.str3, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x > i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > br label %bb1 > > The code slice in verify-fixrace.cpp in attachment: > > cerr << "IsFirst Current Inst: " << *I; > cerr << "IsFirst First Inst: " << *BB->begin(); > I--; > > Output is: > Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr > ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] > Backward Visit BB: bb > IsFirst Current Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias > getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> > [#uses=0] > IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias > getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> > [#uses=0] > opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173: > llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>& > llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy = > llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off > the beginning of an ilist!"' failed. > 0 opt 0x08642be4 > 1 opt 0x08642f26 > 2 0xb7f7f420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 > 3 libc.so.6 0xb7d0ca01 abort + 257 > 4 libc.so.6 0xb7d0410e __assert_fail + 238 > 5 opt 0x08357997 > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--() + 87 > 6 opt 0x08367104 > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--(int) + 28 > 7 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f781be > defens::verify_fixrace_stub::DFSBackward(llvm::Instruction*, > std::string&, int, bool) + 826 > 8 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f78311 > defens::verify_fixrace_stub::runOnBasicBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&) + 261 > 9 opt 0x085cdaf4 > 10 opt 0x085cee1c > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 250 > 11 opt 0x085cefb8 > llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 98 > 12 opt 0x085cd8a3 > llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 197 > 13 opt 0x085cf256 > llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 116 > 14 opt 0x085cf2af > llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 27 > 15 opt 0x082f91d0 main + 4452 > 16 libc.so.6 0xb7cf6450 __libc_start_main + 224 > 17 opt 0x082e9c11 __gxx_personality_v0 + 849 > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Quoting Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com>: Hi Gabor, I can not open the link, can you send again?> AAAH! > > I see you are still at 2.5. Then this patch (the fix) > is relevant for you: > > <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/ADT/ > ilist.h?r1=66061&r2=68785&diff_format=h> > > Cheers, > > Gabor > > > > On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote: >> Dear developers: >> When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an >> iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first >> instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an >> assertion. >> >> The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: >> bb: ; preds = %bb1 >> %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x >> i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x >> i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> %3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([40 x >> i8]* @.str3, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> %4 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr ([42 x >> i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> br label %bb1 >> >> The code slice in verify-fixrace.cpp in attachment: >> >> cerr << "IsFirst Current Inst: " << *I; >> cerr << "IsFirst First Inst: " << *BB->begin(); >> I--; >> >> Output is: >> Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr >> ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0] >> Backward Visit BB: bb >> IsFirst Current Inst: %2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias >> getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind >> ; <i32> >> [#uses=0] >> IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias >> getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind >> ; <i32> >> [#uses=0] >> opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173: >> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>& >> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy = >> llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off >> the beginning of an ilist!"' failed. >> 0 opt 0x08642be4 >> 1 opt 0x08642f26 >> 2 0xb7f7f420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 >> 3 libc.so.6 0xb7d0ca01 abort + 257 >> 4 libc.so.6 0xb7d0410e __assert_fail + 238 >> 5 opt 0x08357997 >> llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--() + 87 >> 6 opt 0x08367104 >> llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>::operator--(int) + 28 >> 7 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f781be >> defens::verify_fixrace_stub::DFSBackward(llvm::Instruction*, >> std::string&, int, bool) + 826 >> 8 verify-fixrace-stub.so 0xb7f78311 >> defens::verify_fixrace_stub::runOnBasicBlock(llvm::BasicBlock&) + 261 >> 9 opt 0x085cdaf4 >> 10 opt 0x085cee1c >> llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 250 >> 11 opt 0x085cefb8 >> llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 98 >> 12 opt 0x085cd8a3 >> llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 197 >> 13 opt 0x085cf256 >> llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 116 >> 14 opt 0x085cf2af >> llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 27 >> 15 opt 0x082f91d0 main + 4452 >> 16 libc.so.6 0xb7cf6450 __libc_start_main + 224 >> 17 opt 0x082e9c11 __gxx_personality_v0 + 849 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVM... at cs.uiuc.edu >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
- [LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
- [LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
- [LLVMdev] Error when running llc to compile .bc to .s
- [LLVMdev] Patch for llvm::DepthFirstIterator.h and llvm::PostOrderIterator.h