llvm dev - Jul 2008 - [LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)

Hello everybody,

            So I am having some problems with llvm. When I've tried a lot of
times to run  and re-install the llvm, but the same error appears, so:

esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ls
hello  hello.c
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ./hello
Hello World
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c
-o hello.bc
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ls
hello  hello.bc  hello.c
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ lli hello.bc
Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342
(Vers=0, Pos=4)
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-dis < hello.bc[
bash: hello.bc[: No such file or directory
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-dis < hello.bc
llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)

Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of
llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this.

some helps???

thanks
italo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080703/287e43ca/attachment.html>

> Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of
> llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this.
If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same 
rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You 
can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example.

What version of llvm and llvm-gcc are you using?

-Tanya

I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1

2008/7/3 Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>:
>
> > Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that
versions
> of
> > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do
this.
>
> If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same
> rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You
> can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example.
>
> What version of llvm and llvm-gcc are you using?
>
> -Tanya
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080703/c942aaf9/attachment.html>