Am Samstag, den 22.03.2008, 09:45 -0500 schrieb Andrew Lenharth:> officially support for llvm-gcc4.0 has been dropped. > unofficially I still keep llvm-gcc4.0 compiling because I need it for > some stuff. But this will only last until I can use 4.2.OK, that's a clear roadmap. Maybe the docs should be updated to reflect this status? They still present 4.0 as if it were the default that one should use. Regards, Jo
On Mar 22, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:> Am Samstag, den 22.03.2008, 09:45 -0500 schrieb Andrew Lenharth: >> officially support for llvm-gcc4.0 has been dropped. >> unofficially I still keep llvm-gcc4.0 compiling because I need it for >> some stuff. But this will only last until I can use 4.2. > > OK, that's a clear roadmap. >Please do not rely on llvm-gcc.40. I sent out this announcement last month: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-February/012416.html> Maybe the docs should be updated to reflect this status? They still > present 4.0 as if it were the default that one should use. >2.2 docs will still have references to llvm-gcc4.0. Can you point out specifically which docs you are referring to? I'm pretty sure we were ambiguous on which one to use ;) but regardless should be updated. -Tanya> Regards, > Jo > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Am Sonntag, den 23.03.2008, 11:22 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner:> 2.2 docs will still have references to llvm-gcc4.0. Can you point out > specifically which docs you are referring to? I'm pretty sure we were > ambiguous on which one to use ;) but regardless should be updated.http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#quickstart says on item #4: "Install the llvm-gcc4.0 (or llvm-gcc4.2) front end if you intend to compile C or C++" (Actually this passage should be updated with a hint why one would want to choose one or the other compiler.) I'm not sure about other passages, that's just he page I was working off. Regards, Jo