On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Reid Spencer wrote:> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 00:27 +0300, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >>> 2) Is bugpoint project buildable on windows? >> Yes. > > Really?Yep.> When did that happen?Apparently Dec 22, 2005. Some rspencer guy did it: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351> Are we now just execing the sub-processes > instead of forking them?yep, :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
LMAO .. I don't even remember the changes I've made .. and less than a year ago. I am getting old. Reid. On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 16:50 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:> On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 00:27 +0300, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > > >>> 2) Is bugpoint project buildable on windows? > >> Yes. > > > > Really? > > Yep. > > > When did that happen? > > Apparently Dec 22, 2005. Some rspencer guy did it: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351 > > > Are we now just execing the sub-processes > > instead of forking them? > > yep, :) > > -Chris >
Reid Spencer wrote:>LMAO .. I don't even remember the changes I've made .. and less than a >year ago. > >I am getting old. > >No, your brain just has 640K, which should be enough for anybody. :) -- John T.>Reid. > >On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 16:50 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >>On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 00:27 +0300, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>2) Is bugpoint project buildable on windows? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Yes. >>>> >>>> >>>Really? >>> >>> >>Yep. >> >> >> >>>When did that happen? >>> >>> >>Apparently Dec 22, 2005. Some rspencer guy did it: >>http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351 >> >> >> >>>Are we now just execing the sub-processes >>>instead of forking them? >>> >>> >>yep, :) >> >>-Chris >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >LLVM Developers mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >