in case you're interested in having llvm in debian sarge: it was removed today. I don't know why, but you might want to find out because sarge is in freeze phase for release next month. regards, -- Stefan Strasser
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:18:26AM +0200, Stefan Strasser wrote:> in case you're interested in having llvm in debian sarge: it was > removed today. I don't know why, but you might want to find out > because sarge is in freeze phase for release next month.Possibly because of these: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=llvm I addressed the first one and fixed it in CVS -- LLVM used to produce an executable named `extract' which conflicted with another program of the same name; I renamed ours to `llvm-extract'. However, they are building the .deb from 1.4, so the patch didn't make it nor were they interested. Instead, they marked it as "conflicting" with `extract', but the bug is not closed. The second one is a "serious policy violation", which isn't as clear to me what the bug reporter is saying, but it mentions warnings during doxygen build and missing fonts and related issues that I'm not quite following. If anyone wants to look into this, details are here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308694 -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 19:51 -0500, Misha Brukman wrote:> The second one is a "serious policy violation", which isn't as clear to > me what the bug reporter is saying, but it mentions warnings during > doxygen build and missing fonts and related issues that I'm not quite > following.(CCing the bug and thus the submitter) sounds like a missing built-depends, at least graphviz, possibly something else. Could you give us some of the error output from your build to help narrow things down? Thanks Andrew Lenharth andrewl at debian.org alenhar2 at cs.uiuc.edu
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 19:51 -0500, Misha Brukman wrote:> I addressed the first one and fixed it in CVS -- LLVM used to produce an > executable named `extract' which conflicted with another program of the > same name; I renamed ours to `llvm-extract'. However, they are building > the .deb from 1.4, so the patch didn't make it nor were they interested. > Instead, they marked it as "conflicting" with `extract', but the bug is > not closed.(CCing the bug) In CVS this bug is fixed as misha said. http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050418/025743.html There shouldn't be any reason not to do the same thing to the 1.4 src package. Andrew Lenharth andrewl at debian.org alenhar2 at cs.uiuc.edu