Christian Borntraeger
2016-Oct-19 06:56 UTC
[PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
On 09/29/2016 05:51 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:> this implements the s390 backend for commit > "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface" > by reworking the existing smp_vcpu_scheduled into > arch_vcpu_is_preempted. We can then also get rid of the > local cpu_is_preempted function by moving the > CIF_ENABLED_WAIT test into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>Martin, Peter, I think we could go with the patch as is. In other words not providing arch_vcpu_is_preempted for !CONFIG_SMP. This will result in compile errors if code does spinning or yielding for non-SMP kernels - which does not make sense to me, so this might actually be a nice indicator. If you prefer the !CONFIG_SMP implementation let me know and I will respin. In any case, Martin if the patch is ok for you, can you ack, so that Peter can take that patch together with Pan Xinhui series?> --- > arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 +++ > arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 9 +++++++-- > arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c | 25 ++++++++----------------- > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h > index 63ebf37..e16e02f 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h > @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ _raw_compare_and_swap(unsigned int *lock, unsigned int old, unsigned int new) > return __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(lock, old, new); > } > > +bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu); > +#define vcpu_is_preempted arch_vcpu_is_preempted > + > /* > * Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's > * on the local processor, one does not. > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c > index 7b89a75..4aadd16 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c > @@ -376,10 +376,15 @@ int smp_find_processor_id(u16 address) > return -1; > } > > -int smp_vcpu_scheduled(int cpu) > +bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) > { > - return pcpu_running(pcpu_devices + cpu); > + if (test_cpu_flag_of(CIF_ENABLED_WAIT, cpu)) > + return false; > + if (pcpu_running(pcpu_devices + cpu)) > + return false; > + return true; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_vcpu_is_preempted); > > void smp_yield_cpu(int cpu) > { > diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c > index e5f50a7..e48a48e 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c > +++ b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c > @@ -37,15 +37,6 @@ static inline void _raw_compare_and_delay(unsigned int *lock, unsigned int old) > asm(".insn rsy,0xeb0000000022,%0,0,%1" : : "d" (old), "Q" (*lock)); > } > > -static inline int cpu_is_preempted(int cpu) > -{ > - if (test_cpu_flag_of(CIF_ENABLED_WAIT, cpu)) > - return 0; > - if (smp_vcpu_scheduled(cpu)) > - return 0; > - return 1; > -} > - > void arch_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lp) > { > unsigned int cpu = SPINLOCK_LOCKVAL; > @@ -62,7 +53,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lp) > continue; > } > /* First iteration: check if the lock owner is running. */ > - if (first_diag && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > + if (first_diag && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > first_diag = 0; > continue; > @@ -81,7 +72,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lp) > * yield the CPU unconditionally. For LPAR rely on the > * sense running status. > */ > - if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > + if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > first_diag = 0; > } > @@ -108,7 +99,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lp, unsigned long flags) > continue; > } > /* Check if the lock owner is running. */ > - if (first_diag && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > + if (first_diag && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > first_diag = 0; > continue; > @@ -127,7 +118,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lp, unsigned long flags) > * yield the CPU unconditionally. For LPAR rely on the > * sense running status. > */ > - if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > + if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > first_diag = 0; > } > @@ -165,7 +156,7 @@ void _raw_read_lock_wait(arch_rwlock_t *rw) > owner = 0; > while (1) { > if (count-- <= 0) { > - if (owner && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) > + if (owner && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > count = spin_retry; > } > @@ -211,7 +202,7 @@ void _raw_write_lock_wait(arch_rwlock_t *rw, unsigned int prev) > owner = 0; > while (1) { > if (count-- <= 0) { > - if (owner && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) > + if (owner && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > count = spin_retry; > } > @@ -241,7 +232,7 @@ void _raw_write_lock_wait(arch_rwlock_t *rw) > owner = 0; > while (1) { > if (count-- <= 0) { > - if (owner && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) > + if (owner && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) > smp_yield_cpu(~owner); > count = spin_retry; > } > @@ -285,7 +276,7 @@ void arch_lock_relax(unsigned int cpu) > { > if (!cpu) > return; > - if (MACHINE_IS_LPAR && !cpu_is_preempted(~cpu)) > + if (MACHINE_IS_LPAR && !arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~cpu)) > return; > smp_yield_cpu(~cpu); > } >
Heiko Carstens
2016-Oct-19 07:44 UTC
[PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:> On 09/29/2016 05:51 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > this implements the s390 backend for commit > > "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface" > > by reworking the existing smp_vcpu_scheduled into > > arch_vcpu_is_preempted. We can then also get rid of the > > local cpu_is_preempted function by moving the > > CIF_ENABLED_WAIT test into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > > > Martin, Peter, > > I think we could go with the patch as is. In other words not providing > arch_vcpu_is_preempted for !CONFIG_SMP. > > This will result in compile errors if code does spinning or yielding for > non-SMP kernels - which does not make sense to me, so this might actually > be a nice indicator. > If you prefer the !CONFIG_SMP implementation let me know and I will respin....but I do prefer an implementation for !CONFIG_SMP. I'm tired of fixing silly compile errors that only happen on s390.
Christian Borntraeger
2016-Oct-19 08:42 UTC
[PATCH v3] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
this implements the s390 backend for commit "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface" by reworking the existing smp_vcpu_scheduled into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. We can then also get rid of the local cpu_is_preempted function by moving the CIF_ENABLED_WAIT test into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++++++ arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 9 +++++++-- arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c | 25 ++++++++----------------- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h index 7e9e09f..7ecd890 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@ _raw_compare_and_swap(unsigned int *lock, unsigned int old, unsigned int new) return __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(lock, old, new); } +#ifndef CONFIG_SMP +static inline bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) { return false; } +#else +bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu); +#endif + +#define vcpu_is_preempted arch_vcpu_is_preempted + /* * Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's * on the local processor, one does not. diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c index 35531fe..b988ed1 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c @@ -368,10 +368,15 @@ int smp_find_processor_id(u16 address) return -1; } -int smp_vcpu_scheduled(int cpu) +bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) { - return pcpu_running(pcpu_devices + cpu); + if (test_cpu_flag_of(CIF_ENABLED_WAIT, cpu)) + return false; + if (pcpu_running(pcpu_devices + cpu)) + return false; + return true; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_vcpu_is_preempted); void smp_yield_cpu(int cpu) { diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c index e5f50a7..e48a48e 100644 --- a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c +++ b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c @@ -37,15 +37,6 @@ static inline void _raw_compare_and_delay(unsigned int *lock, unsigned int old) asm(".insn rsy,0xeb0000000022,%0,0,%1" : : "d" (old), "Q" (*lock)); } -static inline int cpu_is_preempted(int cpu) -{ - if (test_cpu_flag_of(CIF_ENABLED_WAIT, cpu)) - return 0; - if (smp_vcpu_scheduled(cpu)) - return 0; - return 1; -} - void arch_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lp) { unsigned int cpu = SPINLOCK_LOCKVAL; @@ -62,7 +53,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lp) continue; } /* First iteration: check if the lock owner is running. */ - if (first_diag && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { + if (first_diag && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { smp_yield_cpu(~owner); first_diag = 0; continue; @@ -81,7 +72,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lp) * yield the CPU unconditionally. For LPAR rely on the * sense running status. */ - if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { + if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { smp_yield_cpu(~owner); first_diag = 0; } @@ -108,7 +99,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lp, unsigned long flags) continue; } /* Check if the lock owner is running. */ - if (first_diag && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { + if (first_diag && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { smp_yield_cpu(~owner); first_diag = 0; continue; @@ -127,7 +118,7 @@ void arch_spin_lock_wait_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lp, unsigned long flags) * yield the CPU unconditionally. For LPAR rely on the * sense running status. */ - if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { + if (!MACHINE_IS_LPAR || arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) { smp_yield_cpu(~owner); first_diag = 0; } @@ -165,7 +156,7 @@ void _raw_read_lock_wait(arch_rwlock_t *rw) owner = 0; while (1) { if (count-- <= 0) { - if (owner && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) + if (owner && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) smp_yield_cpu(~owner); count = spin_retry; } @@ -211,7 +202,7 @@ void _raw_write_lock_wait(arch_rwlock_t *rw, unsigned int prev) owner = 0; while (1) { if (count-- <= 0) { - if (owner && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) + if (owner && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) smp_yield_cpu(~owner); count = spin_retry; } @@ -241,7 +232,7 @@ void _raw_write_lock_wait(arch_rwlock_t *rw) owner = 0; while (1) { if (count-- <= 0) { - if (owner && cpu_is_preempted(~owner)) + if (owner && arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~owner)) smp_yield_cpu(~owner); count = spin_retry; } @@ -285,7 +276,7 @@ void arch_lock_relax(unsigned int cpu) { if (!cpu) return; - if (MACHINE_IS_LPAR && !cpu_is_preempted(~cpu)) + if (MACHINE_IS_LPAR && !arch_vcpu_is_preempted(~cpu)) return; smp_yield_cpu(~cpu); } -- 2.5.5
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH v3] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- [PATCH v3] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted