Q
2015-Feb-17 00:20 UTC
[Bridge] What is the difference between using a virtual bridge and a an ethernet interface used a bdrige
Here is a program that can be used to bridge a virtual process (a router) to a specific interface https://github.com/jlgaddis/ioulive86 I have tried to use br0 as the interface that I am bridging to but it did not work The first router is connecting and, by sniffing BR0 you can see its traffic The second router does not seem to connect properly and I am wondering why. If I repeat the experiment by bridging the two processes to eth0 I can see traffic coming from both virtual routers and they can see each other What is the fundamental difference between br0 and eth0 in these situations ? Thanks Q -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20150216/788c5106/attachment-0003.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bridge] Sniffing a linux bridge vs sniffing enslaved interfaces
- [Bridge] Sniffing a linux bridge vs sniffing enslaved interfaces
- [Bridge] Is there anyway to force an ethernet inteface to stay up (ignore carrier detection) in order to keep the bridge up?
- [Bridge] Re: ethernet device xmit function is not gettting called
- Re: bridge / ubuntu / no arp reply