klibc - Mar 2008 - the most simply attempt [ibmdos_1978@MYS.CO.JP: 15 tips on mind blowing foreplay]

| Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:06:21 +0200
| From: Rain Myers <ibmdos_1978 at MYS.CO.JP>
| To: klibc at zytor.com
| Subject: [klibc] 15 tips on mind blowing foreplay
> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:04:20 -0700
> From: "H. Peter Anvin"
> To: klibc list <klibc at zytor.com>
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
to agree to include this in address field ('to' or 'cc'),
otherwise /dev/zero. Better SMTP 555, possible only if
SMTP daemon can check data before accepting message.
______

>  > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:04:20 -0700
>  > From: "H. Peter Anvin"
>  > To: klibc list <klibc at zytor.com>
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  to agree to include this in address field ('to' or 'cc'),
>  otherwise /dev/zero. Better SMTP 555, possible only if
>  SMTP daemon can check data before accepting message.
Interestingly enough, after a message to lkml i've got this one:
>From: Riekemmichael at aol.com
>To: Oleg Verych <olecom at flower.upol.cz>
>Reply-To: Riekemmichael at aol.com
>Subject: RE: 2000 ACURA INTEGRA GS-R
>Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:29:40 -0700
>Content-Type: text/plain
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Loop: Riekemmichael at aol.com
>X-FX-Loop: Riekemmichael at aol.com
>X-AOL-IP: 172.133.238.211
>X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
>Message-ID: <d4b.26e39867.35215238 at aol.com>
>X-Spam-Flag: YES

it includes correct "To:" header and it wasn't spam on gmail.
Yet it climes to be a reply and it has no in-reply-to whatsoever.
__________