You already mentioned that regular arbiter works fine for you .
What are the considerations to switch from regular to thin arbiter ?
I think that thin arbiter is suitable for environments where a third node is not
possible locally and is a compromise in order to avoid 'replica 2'
volumes.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
? ?????, 18 ???????? 2020 ?., 23:54:59 ???????+2, WK <wkmail at bneit.com>
??????:
OK, so it seems 8.x is the way to go
So what about Thin Arbiter?
Is anyone one using it in production?
-wk
On 12/18/2020 12:59 AM, Olaf Buitelaar wrote:
>??
> It is in their release
notes;?https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/7.9/
>
>
>
> Ok, we've usually?good experiences with inplace update's. But
taking the safe route is always a good idea!?
>
>
>
>??
> Op do 17 dec. 2020 om 19:49 schreef WK <wkmail at bneit.com>:
>
>
>>
>> On 12/17/2020 10:13 AM, Olaf Buitelaar wrote:
>>> Hi WK,
>>>
>>> i believe gluster 7 just received it's
>>> latest?maintenance?patch?@version 7.9. so that's a dead end
from there on.
>>>
>> Hmm, ok, the website should reflect that then.
>>
>>
>>> I'm not sure if you can skip a whole version going straight to
8.
>>
>> well it would be a forklift upgrade.
>>
>> We build up new boxes and migrate over the data.
>>
>> The one area we have been burned before on Gluster is doing in place
>> upgrades. Since we don't have all our eggs in one basket we can
migrate
>> one cluster at a time that way.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
________
Community Meeting Calendar:
Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users