Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
2018-Nov-09 15:08 UTC
[Gluster-users] does your samba work with 4.1.x (centos 7.5)
On 11/9/18 8:12 AM, lejeczek wrote:> hi guys > > I presume because 4.1.x has been in EPEL repo it is confirmed and > validated to work 100% with default samba installation.GlusterFS ? any version ? is _not_ in EPEL. However it is in the CentOS Storage SIG.> > But, I'd prefer to here you guys say you ACTUALLY have your samba work > 100% with 4.1.x. Anybody?Nobody has built Samba in the CentOS Storage SIG with GlusterFS support. Not for a long time anyway. The last time it was built was over four years ago ? for el6. It would be great if someone in one of the Gluster, Samba, or CentOS communities would start building it on a regular basis. Any volunteers? -- Kaleb
Diego Remolina
2018-Nov-09 15:19 UTC
[Gluster-users] does your samba work with 4.1.x (centos 7.5)
Hmmm yes and no... Have had problems with samba 4.7.x from Centos repos and Gluster 3.10.x when using plugin vfs gluster to access shares so I had to use fuse mounts and point samba to fuse mounts. I tried an upgrade to glusterfs 4.1.5 a couple days ago and samba worked with it but still using fuse mounts, not vfs gluster. A while back a combination of samba vfs plugin ans gluster broke the use of Autodesk Revit files stored in gluster. However since I am still running 3.10.12, I am not able to open any bug reports or anything given it is no longer supported. I was hopping to do that with gluster 4.1.5, but had to roll back to 3.10.12. These are my current rpms (one version behind in samba) from Centos: rpm -qa | grep samba samba-client-libs-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 samba-common-4.7.1-6.el7.noarch samba-common-libs-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 samba-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 samba-libs-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 samba-common-tools-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 rpm -qa | grep gluster glusterfs-api-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-client-xlators-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch glusterfs-fuse-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-server-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.7.1-6.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-libs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 glusterfs-rdma-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-gluster-3.9.0-14.el7_5.8.x86_64 glusterfs-cli-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64 Diego On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:> > On 11/9/18 8:12 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > hi guys > > > > I presume because 4.1.x has been in EPEL repo it is confirmed and > > validated to work 100% with default samba installation. > > GlusterFS ? any version ? is _not_ in EPEL. > > However it is in the CentOS Storage SIG. > > > > > But, I'd prefer to here you guys say you ACTUALLY have your samba work > > 100% with 4.1.x. Anybody? > > Nobody has built Samba in the CentOS Storage SIG with GlusterFS support. > Not for a long time anyway. The last time it was built was over four > years ago ? for el6. > > It would be great if someone in one of the Gluster, Samba, or CentOS > communities would start building it on a regular basis. > > Any volunteers? > > -- > > Kaleb > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
lejeczek
2018-Nov-12 20:11 UTC
[Gluster-users] does your samba work with 4.1.x (centos 7.5)
On 09/11/2018 15:08, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:> On 11/9/18 8:12 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> hi guys >> >> I presume because 4.1.x has been in EPEL repo it is confirmed and >> validated to work 100% with default samba installation. > GlusterFS ? any version ? is _not_ in EPEL. > > However it is in the CentOS Storage SIG.all glusterfs I see & get is simply from/by installing packages, eg centos-release-gluster312-1.0-2.el7.centos.noarch centos-release-gluster41-1.0-3.el7.centos.noarch These are simply repo packages but still these repos points to centos' own mirrors. To me it seems like all gluster versions are there in Centos, so is Samba. So I do not tamper with packages, nor I get/use extra third party repos. Thus my question is valid and correct - anybody would assume that these should be tested, specifically Samba against glusterfs, especially against 4.1.x No?>> But, I'd prefer to here you guys say you ACTUALLY have your samba work >> 100% with 4.1.x. Anybody? > Nobody has built Samba in the CentOS Storage SIG with GlusterFS support. > Not for a long time anyway. The last time it was built was over four > years ago ? for el6. > > It would be great if someone in one of the Gluster, Samba, or CentOS > communities would start building it on a regular basis. > > Any volunteers? >