Gluster users - Sep 2013 - Possible memory leak ?

Hi,

I am using gluster 3.3.1 on Centos 6, installed from
the glusterfs-3.3.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm rpms.
I am seeing the Committed_AS memory continually increasing and the
processes  using the memory are glusterfsd instances.

see http://imgur.com/K3dalTW for graph.

Both nodes are exhibiting the same behaviour, I have tried the suggested

echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

but it made no difference. It there a known issue with 3.3.1 ?

Thanks

John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130911/0b9be3d7/attachment.html>

I'm aware of 2 different kinds of memory leaks on 3.3.1, one is in
geo-replication and another one is native client side memory leak.
Sadly both got mixed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841617

I can tell you that geo-replication leak is still present in 3.4.0 and
native client leak isn't but I don't know what patch you need to
backport :(


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John Ewing <johnewing1 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using gluster 3.3.1 on Centos 6, installed from
> the glusterfs-3.3.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm rpms.
> I am seeing the Committed_AS memory continually increasing and the
> processes  using the memory are glusterfsd instances.
>
> see http://imgur.com/K3dalTW for graph.
>
> Both nodes are exhibiting the same behaviour, I have tried the suggested
>
> echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> but it made no difference. It there a known issue with 3.3.1 ?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130911/9804dd26/attachment.html>