> On 7 August 2016, at 21:27, Zoran Kolic <zkolic at sbb.rs> wrote: > >> However, that patch works and I am now able to upgrade to 11.0-BETA4. > > Would you continue informing us with the end result of your procedure. > Personally, I will go the same way on my home nodes. I'm sure latter > RCs would be more friendly regarding this upgrade. Since I have desktop > and laptop, I'm not able to play and miss.The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and the server is running 11.0-BETA4.
> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and the server is running 11.0-BETA4.I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch. Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < something"? You saved me from installing from the start, which I dislike a lot. Not right now. I will wait for a release. If I do it more freq, my nodes would stop working, since they are not new (read old). Zoran
> On 7 August 2016, at 23:05, Zoran Kolic <zkolic at sbb.rs> wrote: > >> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and the server is running 11.0-BETA4. > > I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch. > Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < something"? > You saved me from installing from the start, which I dislike a lot. > Not right now. I will wait for a release. If I do it more freq, my > nodes would stop working, since they are not new (read old).No, you have to vi the file and go to approximately the location indicated in the patch file and replace the one line. There are comments in above that line which will match those in the patch to help you find the right place. I suspect the provided patch is for the 10.x version of that file.