Mark Millard
2014-Nov-19 04:17 UTC
FYI: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/installation.html says: "For SVN use the releng/10.0 branch" [not releng/10.1]
https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/installation.html says:> For SVN use the releng/10.0 branch which will be where any upcoming Security Advisories or Errata Notices will be applied.Note the "10.0" instead of "10.1". I looked and http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1/ does exist so it would appear that it is at least being prepared. Do I misunderstand the intent? ==Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net
Glen Barber
2014-Nov-19 04:38 UTC
FYI: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/installation.html says: "For SVN use the releng/10.0 branch" [not releng/10.1]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:17:56PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:> https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/installation.html says: > > > For SVN use the releng/10.0 branch which will be where any upcoming Security Advisories or Errata Notices will be applied. > > Note the "10.0" instead of "10.1". >Fixed in r46001 of the documentation tree, and the change should be live within the next few minutes. Thank you for the report. Glen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20141119/b9683540/attachment.sig>