No-one with any clues or recommendations? :/ CCing to -stable too..
Thanks
--
Johan Str?m
Stromnet
johan@stromnet.se
http://www.stromnet.se/
On Oct 29, 2007, at 09:37 , Johan Str?m wrote:
> Hello
>
> I got a FreeBSD 6.2 box running a few jails, with a pretty strict
> PF ruleset. I got a problem with traffic between two of the jails.
> Both have public IPs (one of them have two using the jail-multiple-
> ip-patch). The problem I have is when they are to talk with each
> other. First let med describe the PF ruleset (somewhat stripped
> down but this should be the relevant stuff)
>
> jail1=xx.xx.xx.131
> jail2a=xx.xx.xx.133
> jail2b=xx.xx.xx.134
> scrub in all
> block drop in log
> # base system talk to itself
> pass in on lo0 inet from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1
>
> # all can talk out
> pass out on em0 proto tcp flags S/SA modulate state
> pass out on em0 proto udp keep state
>
> # jails talk to them selfs
> pass in on lo0 inet from $jail1 to $jail1
> pass in on lo0 inet from {$jail2a $jail2b} to {$jail2a $jail2b}
>
> # let smtp in on jail1
> pass in on {lo0 em0} inet proto tcp from any to $jail1 port smtp
> flags S/SA modulate state
>
> Okay, so the problem occurs when jail2 shall talk to jail1 on port
> 25 (smtp). From the above rules, when the traffic leaves jail2
> (traffic comes from $jail2b it seems) it should match the last rule
> and create a state. And so it does!
>
> self tcp xx.xx.xx:25 <- xx.xx.xx.134:57557 SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED
> [3014249759 + 65536](+2074393365) wscale 1 [4121000179 + 65536]
> (+541973245) wscale 1
> age 00:01:03, expires in 00:00:01, 7:10 pkts, 384:640 bytes
>
> So the SYN arives at $jail1, but the SYNACK fails to go back to
> $jail2b (where the state should let the packet back in?), which is
> also seen in the following row from pflog0:
>
> 09:30:34.370402 rule 1/0(match): block in on lo0: (tos 0x0, ttl
> 64, id 35618, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: TCP (6), length: 64)
> xx.xx.xx.131.25 > xx.xx.xx.134.57557: S 793675827:793675827(0) ack
> 4121000179 win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,[|tcp]>
>
> So.. What have I missed? The state is created but it doesnt seem to
> match enough bytes or something? 384:640 matched packets, so et
> matches in both directions?
>
> Any clues are welcome! Thanks
>
> --
> Johan Str?m
> Stromnet
> johan@stromnet.se
> http://www.stromnet.se/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"