On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:43:32PM +0000, David E. Cross
wrote:> I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
> performance under 6.x is slower then 4.X, and this is listed as "not
> done".
>
> I noticed that 6.1 seemed to be a dog, but 6.0 I thought was better. As
> a test I installed 6.0 and 6.1 in parallel on my laptop with identical
> ports trees (and packages) and 6.0 does feel a lot more responisve to
> swapping; I would be eager to help track this down if someone could give
> me some pointers. If I have to _guess_ as to a problem it would seem
> like some of the scheduling priorities changed. (this is with GENERIC
> under 6.0 and 6.1, this is with 6.1-PRERELEASE from April 5; I can CVSUP
> to the latest if people think things have changed.)
I didn't think this was a 6.1 regression compared to 6.0, but 6.x
compared to 4.x. It would be good to try and quantify any performance
differences here - so far it's just a bunch of people's subjective
opinions (including mine) after upgrading from 4.x.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060412/cd344054/attachment-0001.pgp