The difference can either be small or from
200-300 K. Is adding welch to libflac a good
idea? Would you like access to any of the files?
At 08:17 AM 9/29/2022, Martijn van Beurden wrote:>Op di 27 sep. 2022 om 17:10 schreef Michael D.
>Lawler <<mailto:mdlawler at lawlers.us>mdlawler at lawlers.us>:
>These are all 44.1kHz and adding -b 4608 helped,
>but ffmpeg still does better than flac for this handful of files.
>
>
>Then I think the remaining difference might be
>in the apodization used by ffmpeg. I think
>ffmpeg uses a welch window, whereas
>libFLAC? uses a rather complicated arrangement
>of brute-forcing various windows approaches, not including welch.
>
>If that is not it, I presume the file size
>differences in these files are very small?
>?
--
Michael D. Lawler
email mailto:mdlawler at lawlers.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20220929/9bbf8734/attachment.htm>