Fedora directory users - Nov 2007 - Announcing Fedora Directory Server 1.1 Beta

Fedora Directory Server 1.1 Beta is now available.

See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes for information.

Where can I find the sources?

I''ve had a look through the wiki and cant locate them 

Thank You

Anthony

Anthony Giggins wrote:
> Where can I find the sources?
>
> I''ve had a look through the wiki and cant locate them 
>   
You can grab them from the source RPMS - just edit the yum .repo 
(idmcommon.repo and dirsrv.repo) files and change RPMS to SRPMS

For the fedora-ds-base sources, the sources are available from the 
Fedora SRPM repo
> Thank You
>
> Anthony
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

Richard Megginson wrote:
>You can grab them from the source RPMS - just edit the yum .repo 
> (idmcommon.repo and dirsrv.repo) files and change RPMS to SRPMS
>
>For the fedora-ds-base sources, the sources are available from the
> Fedora SRPM repo

What about for other distributions like CENTOS 5.0?

Anthony

Anthony Giggins wrote:
> Richard Megginson wrote:
>   
>> You can grab them from the source RPMS - just edit the yum .repo 
>> (idmcommon.repo and dirsrv.repo) files and change RPMS to SRPMS
>>
>> For the fedora-ds-base sources, the sources are available from the
>> Fedora SRPM repo
>>     
>
>
> What about for other distributions like CENTOS 5.0?
>
>   
For CentOS 5.0, you should be able to use the Fedora 6 binaries, with 
one caveat: Only Red Hat EL 5.1 includes all of the necessary packages.  
So if/when CentOS 5.1 is released, you should be ok.  If you really want 
to run on CentOS 5.0,  you will have to grab the packages for svrcore, 
mozldap, and perl-Mozilla-LDAP from Fedora 6 and install them on CentOS 
5.0.  These packages are included with RHEL 5.1, so should also be 
included with CentOS 5.1
> Anthony
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Megginson
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2007 1:15 PM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora DirectoryServer
1.1Beta

Anthony Giggins wrote:
> Richard Megginson wrote:
>   
>> You can grab them from the source RPMS - just edit the yum .repo 
>> (idmcommon.repo and dirsrv.repo) files and change RPMS to SRPMS
>>
>> For the fedora-ds-base sources, the sources are available from the
>> Fedora SRPM repo
>>     
>
>
> What about for other distributions like CENTOS 5.0?
>
>   
For CentOS 5.0, you should be able to use the Fedora 6 binaries, with 
one caveat: Only Red Hat EL 5.1 includes all of the necessary packages.

So if/when CentOS 5.1 is released, you should be ok.  If you really want

to run on CentOS 5.0,  you will have to grab the packages for svrcore, 
mozldap, and perl-Mozilla-LDAP from Fedora 6 and install them on CentOS 
5.0.  These packages are included with RHEL 5.1, so should also be 
included with CentOS 5.1
> Anthony
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   

Still getting repos errors

http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/idmcommon/fedora/5/x86_64/RPMS/re
podata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
Trying other mirror.
Error: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: idmcommon

Same with SRPMS

http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/idmcommon/fedora/5/x86_64/SRPMS/r
epodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
Trying other mirror.
Error: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: idmcommon


Will there be any dsbuild for version 1.1?

Anthony Giggins wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard
> Megginson
> Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2007 1:15 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora DirectoryServer
> 1.1Beta
>
> Anthony Giggins wrote:
>   
>> Richard Megginson wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> You can grab them from the source RPMS - just edit the yum .repo 
>>> (idmcommon.repo and dirsrv.repo) files and change RPMS to SRPMS
>>>
>>> For the fedora-ds-base sources, the sources are available from the
>>> Fedora SRPM repo
>>>     
>>>       
>> What about for other distributions like CENTOS 5.0?
>>
>>   
>>     
> For CentOS 5.0, you should be able to use the Fedora 6 binaries, with 
> one caveat: Only Red Hat EL 5.1 includes all of the necessary packages.
>
> So if/when CentOS 5.1 is released, you should be ok.  If you really want
>
> to run on CentOS 5.0,  you will have to grab the packages for svrcore, 
> mozldap, and perl-Mozilla-LDAP from Fedora 6 and install them on CentOS 
> 5.0.  These packages are included with RHEL 5.1, so should also be 
> included with CentOS 5.1
>   
>> Anthony
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>   
>>     
>
>
> Still getting repos errors
>   
If you really want to do this on centos 5, you''ll have to edit the
.repo
files to change $releasever to 6 - otherwise, it thinks the releasever 
is 5 because you''re on centos 5.
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/idmcommon/fedora/5/x86_64/RPMS/re
> podata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> Trying other mirror.
> Error: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: idmcommon
>
> Same with SRPMS
>
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/idmcommon/fedora/5/x86_64/SRPMS/r
> epodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> Trying other mirror.
> Error: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: idmcommon
>
>
> Will there be any dsbuild for version 1.1?
>   
No, probably not.  configure && make is pretty easy.  However, if there 
is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will consider
it.
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

> Richard Megginson wrote:
> No, probably not.  configure && make is pretty easy.  However, if
there 
> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will consider
it.

Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to me
where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/

Anthony Giggins wrote:
>   
>   
>> Richard Megginson wrote:
>> No, probably not.  configure && make is pretty easy.  However,
if
>>     
> there 
>   
>> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will consider
>>     
> it.
>
> Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to me
> where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/
>   
They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs 
(SRPMS):
e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package - 
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/dirsrv/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-1.15.fc6.src.rpm
use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i
to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm.
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

I am trying to build the beta version on Free BSD, but I am getting the
following error
The LDAPSDK version in -I/usr/local/include/ldap-standard.h 
The ldapsdk version is ldapsdk-1998.12.31_1 
I remember seeing here that the rpm is only available in the latest redhat or
fedora. Can someone give me the name of the source rpm package so that I can try
building this?
Is the ldapsdk even necessary? 





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com> 
To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
<fedora-directory-users@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:11:53 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles 
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora DirectoryServer 1.1Beta 

Anthony Giggins wrote: 
> 
> 
>> Richard Megginson wrote: 
>> No, probably not. configure && make is pretty easy. However, if
>> 
> there 
> 
>> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will consider 
>> 
> it. 
> 
> Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to me 
> where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/ 
> 
They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs 
(SRPMS): 
e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package - 
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/dirsrv/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-1.15.fc6.src.rpm
use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i 
to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm. 
> 
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list 
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users 
> 


-- 
- Thank you, 
- Jared B. Griffith 
- Farheap Solutions, Inc. 
- Lead Systems Administrator 
- California IT Department 
- Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com 
- Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266 
- Cell Phone - 949.910.6542

Jared B. Griffith wrote:
> I am trying to build the beta version on Free BSD, but I am getting 
> the following error
> The LDAPSDK version in -I/usr/local/include/ldap-standard.h
> The ldapsdk version is ldapsdk-1998.12.31_1
> I remember seeing here that the rpm is only available in the latest 
> redhat or fedora.  Can someone give me the name of the source rpm 
> package so that I can try building this?
> Is the ldapsdk even necessary?
Yes, it is definitely necessary.  What version of Free BSD?  Does that 
have Mozilla nspr and nss, as separate packages (i.e. not bundled witih 
Firefox) with the headers?  If not, you''ll have to start with nspr and
nss:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/v4.6.7/src
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_11_7_RTM/src

Then svrcore:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.4/src

mozldap (Mozilla LDAP SDK) also requires cyrus-sasl, which I assume is 
already available.

The mozldap source code is here - 
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.4/src

If you would rather have a source RPM, you can get the mozldap source 
rpm from any fedora mirror e.g. 
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/8/Everything/source/SRPMS/mozldap-6.0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm

The srpms for the other components (nspr, nss, etc.) are also available 
from the same location.

>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com>
> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
project."
> <fedora-directory-users@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:11:53 AM (GMT-0800) 
> America/Los_Angeles
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora 
> DirectoryServer        1.1Beta
>
> Anthony Giggins wrote:
> >  
> >  
> >> Richard Megginson wrote:
> >> No, probably not.  configure && make is pretty easy. 
However, if
> >>    
> > there
> >  
> >> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will
consider
> >>    
> > it.
> >
> > Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to me
> > where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/
> >  
> They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs
> (SRPMS):
> e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package -
>
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/dirsrv/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-1.15.fc6.src.rpm
> use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i
> to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm.
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >  
>
>
>
> -- 
> - Thank you,
> - Jared B. Griffith
> - Farheap Solutions, Inc.
> - Lead Systems Administrator
> - California IT Department
> - Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com
> - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266
> - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

I am trying to build on 7.0 beta, but I am going to actually build on 6.2 as
well. Yes BSD does have nss and nspr (as separate packages), and both are
installed already, I just have to put the location with the config option as
well as the sasl library. I think I am going to go with the source rpms from
that location just to make sure I have the proper versions.





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com> 
To: "Jared B. Griffith" <jared.griffith@farheap.com>,
"General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
<fedora-directory-users@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 6:44:52 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles 
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora DirectoryServer 1.1Beta 

Jared B. Griffith wrote: 
> I am trying to build the beta version on Free BSD, but I am getting 
> the following error 
> The LDAPSDK version in -I/usr/local/include/ldap-standard.h 
> The ldapsdk version is ldapsdk-1998.12.31_1 
> I remember seeing here that the rpm is only available in the latest 
> redhat or fedora. Can someone give me the name of the source rpm 
> package so that I can try building this? 
> Is the ldapsdk even necessary? 
Yes, it is definitely necessary. What version of Free BSD? Does that 
have Mozilla nspr and nss, as separate packages (i.e. not bundled witih 
Firefox) with the headers? If not, you''ll have to start with nspr and
nss:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/v4.6.7/src 
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_11_7_RTM/src 

Then svrcore: 
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.4/src 

mozldap (Mozilla LDAP SDK) also requires cyrus-sasl, which I assume is 
already available. 

The mozldap source code is here - 
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.4/src 

If you would rather have a source RPM, you can get the mozldap source 
rpm from any fedora mirror e.g. 
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/8/Everything/source/SRPMS/mozldap-6.0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm

The srpms for the other components (nspr, nss, etc.) are also available 
from the same location. 

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com> 
> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
project."
> <fedora-directory-users@redhat.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:11:53 AM (GMT-0800) 
> America/Los_Angeles 
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora 
> DirectoryServer 1.1Beta 
> 
> Anthony Giggins wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> >> Richard Megginson wrote: 
> >> No, probably not. configure && make is pretty easy.
However, if
> >> 
> > there 
> > 
> >> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will
consider
> >> 
> > it. 
> > 
> > Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to me 
> > where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/ 
> > 
> They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs 
> (SRPMS): 
> e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package - 
>
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/dirsrv/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-1.15.fc6.src.rpm
> use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i 
> to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list 
> > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com 
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> - Thank you, 
> - Jared B. Griffith 
> - Farheap Solutions, Inc. 
> - Lead Systems Administrator 
> - California IT Department 
> - Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com 
> - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266 
> - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list 
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users 
> 


-- 
- Thank you, 
- Jared B. Griffith 
- Farheap Solutions, Inc. 
- Lead Systems Administrator 
- California IT Department 
- Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com 
- Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266 
- Cell Phone - 949.910.6542

Jared B. Griffith wrote:
>
> I am trying to build on 7.0 beta, but I am going to actually build on 
> 6.2 as well.  Yes BSD does have nss and nspr (as separate packages), 
> and both are installed already, I just have to put the location with 
> the config option as well as the sasl library.  I think I am going to 
> go with the source rpms from that location just to make sure I have 
> the proper versions.
The spec file in the source rpm also contains the configure/build 
arguments which should mostly be applicable to bsd.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com>
> To: "Jared B. Griffith" <jared.griffith@farheap.com>,
"General
> discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." 
> <fedora-directory-users@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 6:44:52 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora 
> DirectoryServer 1.1Beta
>
> Jared B. Griffith wrote:
> > I am trying to build the beta version on Free BSD, but I am getting
> > the following error
> > The LDAPSDK version in -I/usr/local/include/ldap-standard.h
> > The ldapsdk version is ldapsdk-1998.12.31_1
> > I remember seeing here that the rpm is only available in the latest
> > redhat or fedora.  Can someone give me the name of the source rpm
> > package so that I can try building this?
> > Is the ldapsdk even necessary?
> Yes, it is definitely necessary.  What version of Free BSD?  Does that
> have Mozilla nspr and nss, as separate packages (i.e. not bundled witih
> Firefox) with the headers?  If not, you''ll have to start with nspr
and
> nss:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/v4.6.7/src
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_11_7_RTM/src
>
> Then svrcore:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.4/src
>
> mozldap (Mozilla LDAP SDK) also requires cyrus-sasl, which I assume is
> already available.
>
> The mozldap source code is here -
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.4/src
>
> If you would rather have a source RPM, you can get the mozldap source
> rpm from any fedora mirror e.g.
>
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/8/Everything/source/SRPMS/mozldap-6.0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm
>
> The srpms for the other components (nspr, nss, etc.) are also available
> from the same location.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com>
> > To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
project."
> > <fedora-directory-users@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:11:53 AM (GMT-0800)
> > America/Los_Angeles
> > Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora
> > DirectoryServer        1.1Beta
> >
> > Anthony Giggins wrote:
> > >  
> > >  
> > >> Richard Megginson wrote:
> > >> No, probably not.  configure && make is pretty easy. 
However, if
> > >>    
> > > there
> > >  
> > >> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will
consider
> > >>    
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to
me
> > > where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/
> > >  
> > They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs
> > (SRPMS):
> > e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package -
> > 
>
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/dirsrv/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-1.15.fc6.src.rpm
> > use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i
> > to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> > >  
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Thank you,
> > - Jared B. Griffith
> > - Farheap Solutions, Inc.
> > - Lead Systems Administrator
> > - California IT Department
> > - Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com
> > - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266
> > - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> >  
>
>
>
> -- 
> - Thank you,
> - Jared B. Griffith
> - Farheap Solutions, Inc.
> - Lead Systems Administrator
> - California IT Department
> - Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com
> - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266
> - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542

I resorted to installing it on FreeBSD 6.2 and concentrating on that rather than
working on the test server that I was installing on.
I ended up using the ports versions of nss and nspr since the source installs of
those packages from the Mozilla sites were, well, difficult at best to install.
I did end up getting svrcore source installed by using the source from Mozilla.
This was easy and went flawlessly as long as you provide all the configure
options as to where nss and nspr (include and lib) directories are located.
Now I am at the c-sdk package (I am using the one I got out of the source
ldapsdk rpm). I am using that one since the sdk from Mozilla seemed a bit beyond
my source compilation experience (which I am a bit out of practice since we
mainly concentrate on what is available from the upstream providers - either
from Gentoo or FreeBSD, a bit of company policy). I am using the configure
script, and throwing as many configure options as humanly possible (since I want
to make sure it doesn''t overwrite the current ldap header files and
libraries). Configure finishes fine. I then use gmake rather than the normal
make to build the source (since I am sure that it would be looking for gnu make,
and running make just gives me a bunch of errors), it appears to build, which I
am really just guessing on since there are no messages about either build errors
or completion errors. There are some errors while it is building, but nothing
fatal (some normal thread errors and what not). Since it appears that the gmake
finishes completely, I then run gmake install (again, this finishes as the gmake
does, with no error or completion messages). The problem I am seeing is that
even though it seems like the configure, build, and install completed, it did
not install any of the files into the directories I specified or anywhere else
on the machine. Could I be missing something? Is it erroring out possibly? Do I
need to copy the built files over to the directories that I want them in?
Of course, not having the ldapsdk package installed means that I cannot install
the fedora-ds.
I am keeping track of what I am doing and would be happy to either give you a
step by step of this or put it on the fedora-ds wiki if I am able to get this
built correctly and running as it does on Gentoo and Centos.
I would also like to update the Gentoo one, since that one is missing some
important information that needs to be on there to get it running properly
(though the web part of it doesn''t run as it does when using the rpm
build, not sure what is missing, but the Management console and the LDAP parts
all work fine without error).

Thanks for all your help and pointers up until this point Rich. It''s
greatly appreciated.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com> 
To: "Jared B. Griffith" <jared.griffith@farheap.com> 
Cc: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
<fedora-directory-users@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 8:54:14 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles 
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora DirectoryServer 1.1Beta 

Jared B. Griffith wrote: 
> 
> I am trying to build on 7.0 beta, but I am going to actually build on 
> 6.2 as well. Yes BSD does have nss and nspr (as separate packages), 
> and both are installed already, I just have to put the location with 
> the config option as well as the sasl library. I think I am going to 
> go with the source rpms from that location just to make sure I have 
> the proper versions. 
The spec file in the source rpm also contains the configure/build 
arguments which should mostly be applicable to bsd. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com> 
> To: "Jared B. Griffith" <jared.griffith@farheap.com>,
"General
> discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." 
> <fedora-directory-users@redhat.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 6:44:52 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles 
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora 
> DirectoryServer 1.1Beta 
> 
> Jared B. Griffith wrote: 
> > I am trying to build the beta version on Free BSD, but I am getting 
> > the following error 
> > The LDAPSDK version in -I/usr/local/include/ldap-standard.h 
> > The ldapsdk version is ldapsdk-1998.12.31_1 
> > I remember seeing here that the rpm is only available in the latest 
> > redhat or fedora. Can someone give me the name of the source rpm 
> > package so that I can try building this? 
> > Is the ldapsdk even necessary? 
> Yes, it is definitely necessary. What version of Free BSD? Does that 
> have Mozilla nspr and nss, as separate packages (i.e. not bundled witih 
> Firefox) with the headers? If not, you''ll have to start with nspr
and
> nss: 
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/nspr/releases/v4.6.7/src 
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_11_7_RTM/src 
> 
> Then svrcore: 
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/svrcore/releases/4.0.4/src 
> 
> mozldap (Mozilla LDAP SDK) also requires cyrus-sasl, which I assume is 
> already available. 
> 
> The mozldap source code is here - 
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.4/src 
> 
> If you would rather have a source RPM, you can get the mozldap source 
> rpm from any fedora mirror e.g. 
>
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/8/Everything/source/SRPMS/mozldap-6.0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm
> 
> The srpms for the other components (nspr, nss, etc.) are also available 
> from the same location. 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Richard Megginson" <rmeggins@redhat.com> 
> > To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
project."
> > <fedora-directory-users@redhat.com> 
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:11:53 AM (GMT-0800) 
> > America/Los_Angeles 
> > Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora 
> > DirectoryServer 1.1Beta 
> > 
> > Anthony Giggins wrote: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> Richard Megginson wrote: 
> > >> No, probably not. configure && make is pretty easy.
However, if
> > >> 
> > > there 
> > > 
> > >> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will
consider
> > >> 
> > > it. 
> > > 
> > > Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to
me
> > > where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/ 
> > > 
> > They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs
> > (SRPMS): 
> > e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package - 
> > 
>
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/yum/dirsrv/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-1.15.fc6.src.rpm
> > use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i 
> > to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm. 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list 
> > > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com 
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > - Thank you, 
> > - Jared B. Griffith 
> > - Farheap Solutions, Inc. 
> > - Lead Systems Administrator 
> > - California IT Department 
> > - Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com 
> > - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266 
> > - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542 
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > -- 
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list 
> > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com 
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> - Thank you, 
> - Jared B. Griffith 
> - Farheap Solutions, Inc. 
> - Lead Systems Administrator 
> - California IT Department 
> - Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com 
> - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266 
> - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542 


-- 
- Thank you, 
- Jared B. Griffith 
- Farheap Solutions, Inc. 
- Lead Systems Administrator 
- California IT Department 
- Email - jared.griffith@farheap.com 
- Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266 
- Cell Phone - 949.910.6542

Jared B. Griffith wrote:
> I resorted to installing it on FreeBSD 6.2 and concentrating on that 
> rather than working on the test server that I was installing on. 
> I ended up using the ports versions of nss and nspr since the source 
> installs of those packages from the Mozilla sites were, well, 
> difficult at best to install.
> I did end up getting svrcore source installed by using the source from 
> Mozilla.  This was easy and went flawlessly as long as you provide all 
> the configure options as to where nss and nspr (include and lib) 
> directories are located. 
> Now I am at the c-sdk package (I am using the one I got out of the 
> source ldapsdk rpm).  I am using that one since the sdk from Mozilla 
> seemed a bit beyond my source compilation experience (which I am a bit 
> out of practice since we mainly concentrate on what is available from 
> the upstream providers - either from Gentoo or FreeBSD, a bit of 
> company policy).  I am using the configure script, and throwing as 
> many configure options as humanly possible (since I want to make sure 
> it doesn''t overwrite the current ldap header files and libraries).
> Configure finishes fine.  I then use gmake rather than the normal make 
> to build the source (since I am sure that it would be looking for gnu 
> make, and running make just gives me a bunch of errors), it appears to 
> build, which I am really just guessing on since there are no messages 
> about either build errors or completion errors.   There are some 
> errors  while it is building, but nothing fatal (some normal thread 
> errors and what not).  Since it appears that the gmake finishes 
> completely, I then run gmake install (again, this finishes as the 
> gmake does, with no error or completion messages).  The problem I am 
> seeing is that even though it seems like the configure, build, and 
> install completed, it did not install any of the files into the 
> directories I specified or anywhere else on the machine. Could I be 
> missing something?  Is it erroring out possibly?  Do I need to copy 
> the built files over to the directories that I want them in?
> Of course, not having the ldapsdk package installed means that I 
> cannot install the fedora-ds.
> I am keeping track of what I am doing and would be happy to either 
> give you a step by step of this or put it on the fedora-ds wiki if I 
> am able to get this built correctly and running as it does on Gentoo 
> and Centos. 
> I would also like to update the Gentoo one, since that one is missing 
> some important information that needs to be on there to get it running 
> properly (though the web part of it doesn''t run as it does when
using
> the rpm build, not sure what is missing, but the Management console 
> and the LDAP parts all work fine without error).
>
> Thanks for all your help and pointers up until this point Rich. 
It''s
> greatly appreciated.
Unfortunately, the mozldap package configure doesn''t work like regular 
autotool configure does - it doesn''t honor --prefix, and make install 
doesn''t work, neither does make DESTDIR=/path install.  You have to 
install all of the files manually.  If you have the srpm, take a look a 
the spec file, in the %install section.  You''ll see just what it does.

We might want to take this discussion off of the fedora-ds list and on 
to the dev-tech-ldap@lists.mozilla.org list.  We also might want to 
update wiki.mozilla.org with this information about building on BSD.