Hi, I fear I am too stupid: I find nowhere the explanation of the dot in file permissions like: -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 457 Aug 4 17:27 config I have searched in forums, Red Hat deployment guide, storage administration guide etc Thank you for help in advance. Best regards Helmut -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110913/64882b82/attachment.html>
Have you consider doing some reading in stick bits? Sent on the Sprint? Now Network from my BlackBerry? -----Original Message----- From: Helmut Drodofsky <drodofsky at internet-xs.de> Sender: centos-bounces at centos.org Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:31:17 To: 'CentOS mailing list'<centos at centos.org> Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 6: file and directory permissions _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Helmut Drodofsky <drodofsky at internet-xs.de>>I find nowhere the explanation of the dot in file permissions like: >-rw-r--r--. 1 root root? 457 Aug? 4 17:27 config >I have searched in forums, Red Hat deployment guide, storage administration guide etc ??Google "dot in permissions"... Results will tell you to read the ls info page, which says: ???? Following the file mode bits is a single character that specifies ???? whether an alternate access method such as an access control list ???? applies to the file.? When the character following the file mode ???? bits is a space, there is no alternate access method.? When it is ???? a printing character, then there is such a method. ???? GNU `ls' uses a `.' character to indicate a file with an SELinux ???? security context, but no other alternate access method. ???? A file with any other combination of alternate access methods is ???? marked with a `+' character. JD
On 13 September 2011 21:31, Helmut Drodofsky <drodofsky at internet-xs.de> wrote:> > I find nowhere the explanation of the dot in file permissions like: > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root? 457 Aug? 4 17:27 config > > I have searched in forums, Red Hat deployment guide, storage administration > guide etc ??>From info coreutils --> ls --> "what information is listed":"GNU `ls' uses a `.' character to indicate a file with an SELinux security context, but no other alternate access method."